Book Review: Addictions: The Treatment of Drinking Problems: A Guide for the Helping Professions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Treatment of Drinking Problems: A Guide for Helping Professions. Griffith Edwards, E Jane Marshall, Christopher CH Cook. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003.412p. US$50.00. Reviewer rating: Very Good As I began reviewing this book, now in its fourth edition, it dawned on me that I had pleasure of reviewing third edition as well (1). Our patients commonly present a clinical picture of polysubstance abuse; teaching texts devoted exclusively to drinking problems are less common. Thus, in comparing third and fourth editions of this focused publication, I expected to gain a good sense of recent advances in field. Dr Griffith Edwards is founder of National Addiction Centre, London, England, professor emeritus at University of London, and Editor-in-Chief of Addiction. The coauthors since third edition, Dr Jane Marshall and Dr Christopher Cook, are noted for their own pioneering work. Like third edition, book is aimed at a multidisciplinary audience of professionals in field and is divided into 2 main sections. The first section has 13 chapters. A new introductory chapter on history of treatment reminds us that it was Trotter, as early as beginning of 19th century, who posited that, far from being a sin, the habit of drunkenness was a disease of mind (2). An overview of causes of drinking problems follows, integrating related sociocultural, psychological, and biological dimensions across lifespan. The next chapter focuses on drug alcohol and includes an update on its receptors' action. The book's midsection begins with a description of clinical sensitivities surrounding alcohol-dependence syndrome, masterfully covered by group who powerfully helped define it. A synopsis of consequences on family and social functioning follows. The array of neuropsychiatrie as well as psychiatric comorbidities receive expanded attention in this edition. The common comorbid use of other drugs alluded to in my introduction is reviewed in next chapters, along with physical complications. The section appropriately ends with an overview of special clinical presentations among women, as well as an overview of different age, cultural, comorbid, and social groups. However, no mention is made of affected health professionals. The challenges involved in defining and estimating long-term outcomes conclude section. The second section addresses screening, assessment, and treatment issues. The seasoned clinical skills of authors are evident in chapters on screening and assessment and management of withdrawal. (Why, however, was Canadian Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment Scale not mentioned?) This subject is followed by a discussion of therapeutic basic work of engagement and an essay on Alcoholics Anonymous. The next part is, in my opinion, less rewarding. In 24 pages, it reviews a series of psychological approaches (for example, motivational interviewing, cognitive-behavioural therapy, behavioural self-control, relapse prevention, and psychotherapy), along with current pharmacotherapeutic armementarium. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,068 | 0,066 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».