Pathological gambling. Chinese community in Southern Italy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
If the global, demographic and economic change we are witnessing is requiring a new perception of civil society, the role of CP is to initiate and maintain dialogue and mutual support with all actors interested in social change and social innovation.Therefore, CP, among others should start to be a real "linking science" by Discovering empowerment patterns between individuals, groups and social structures not only in the neighborhood, but in all kind of settings where people work and life together (companies, virtual communities, social policy), Learning not only from the past, but sense emerging futures by learning across generations, cultures and institutions Establishing new intersectoral alliances and test new forms of collaboration between different actors in society Enabling mutual risk taking through experimental settings and program evaluation.This requires to add to "incremental", step-by-step social innovations forms of profound, more "radical" social innovations for which collaboration with other disciplines and actors are needed (see the works of C. Otto Scharmer (2007) or the concept of "design thinking" (Brown 2009). Perspectives for Community Psychology in EuropeTraditional values of CP like social change and transformation and current challenges today require more than working in a local community and/or improving the social situation of specific groups.While this work will remain an important core part of CP, the field should empower itself use its competencies to develop social innovations and look at emerging futures by developing shared goals (and take shared risks) by collaborating with other disciplines, companies or other actors in society.CP as a field in Europe should focus on macro-and micro-issues of community building together with various partners: this is why it is important to develop close ties not only with national community psychology groups in Europe and other parts of the world, but also with other psychological and social science/social action networks and associations.The European Union and the European Commission will be one of the most important partners to foster community building and a sense of community in our society.To support this movement and to strengthen the capabilities of each community psychologist in Europe, we should form Community Interest Groups (professional, student and practitioner groups) which will be able to maintain, and promote the rich body of knowledge on community building and develop future questions which may be important for our society.We should invest in a joint education and practice in community psychology and CP special topics in order to develop the idea of community psychology for young professionals.For this we can use and institutionalize a rich body of experience of community psychology programs in universities and schools all over Europe.The time of an interdisciplinary community building and social innovation master program should come within the next years.These kind of programs could enhance the skills for the future of community psychology in Europe:In Social Skills students and practitioners will experience the art of community building as a collaborative and empowering background, leading to social responsiveness and inclusion Community Psychology: Common Values, Diverse Practices 13 Design Skills will develop both strategic-innovative and creative abilities in order to nurture mutual knowing, awareness and playfulness, and Action Skills will focus on how to co-create, implement and evaluate new concepts and social innovations to build communities in different settings.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».