Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In this chapter, we present the teaching initiative of Interaction Design and Physical Computing that is currently under development at Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro – PUC-Rio in Brazil, within the class called Interfaces Físicas e Lógicas, and in the LIFE Lab – Laboratório de Interfaces Físicas Experimentais. A discussion about the emerging area of Physical Computing in the field of Interaction Design is conducted from the conceptual framework of its practice and teaching initiatives in the Design school used for the study. In this context, thoughts on Design Thinking and Reflective Practice by theorists such as Donald Schön, Herbert Simon, and Nigel Cross are brought into the scene, as part of a learning methodology proposal, exploring the relation between the theory of Design and its practice. To expand the discussion, Weiser's ubiquitous computing concept is added as one more approach. In this sense, the idea that we live surrounded by digital interfaces embedded in objects that assist us in activities related to communication, information, entertainment, safety, health, and wellbeing becomes each day more present. Thus we are witnessing the rise of a new area of Design practice, in which designers, besides being users of the digital interactive systems, are involved in the process of development of the interfaces that are responsible for the mediation between the computer systems and men. This emerging area of Design is called Interaction Design, an area that has the discipline known as Physical Computing – in Brazil, Interfaces Físicas – as a key content. The discipline explores the relationship between the physical world and computer systems. Another author, who is brought to the discussion, is O'Sullivan, who advocates that through the use of software, hardware, electronics, sensors, microcontrollers, automation systems, and motors, the Physical Computing devices are digital interactive systems that sense and react to the physical world. Even though there is undeniable growth of the Interaction Design field globally, in Brazilian Design Courses there are still few academic initiatives concerning its teaching, especially at the undergraduate level. In this context, the Interfaces Físicas e Lógicas class from PUC-Rio's Design-Digital Media course has been – since 2010 – among the first Physical Computing classes offered in a Brazilian undergraduate Design program. This teaching–learning initiative has come together with the conception of a laboratory, designed as a space for the practice of Physical Computing. The LIFE Lab is an initiative of PUC-Rio's Department of Arts & Design that aims to provide students with the appropriate environment and technology for the practical development of Physical Computing projects. The lab is integrated to the other labs of the design program such as the product design lab, and the graphic production lab, favoring interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary projects, as well as the interchange between cultures and languages of Design. Occupying 36 square meters of floor space, the lab is equipped with computers, open source software, electronic components, Arduino boards, and a small library. Ever since the implementation of the LIFE Lab, a growing variety of Physical Computing projects have been developed. The projects quite often reveal a thorough design thinking process, in which the reflective practice with Physical Computing tools leads to a variety of creative and innovative Design solutions. One selection of these projects – along with a brief description and analysis of the individual design processes – is presented at the end of the essay. For more information, please visit www.life.dad.puc-rio.br
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».