164 A ROADMAP TO GLOBAL HEALTH EDUCATION: A STUDENT-LED LEARNING INITIATIVE.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose Rising rates of travel and migration, increasing challenges brought by aging populations and chronic diseases, growing urbanization, and the globalization of trade are making global health relevant to more and more medical careers. Infectious disease epidemics, international crises, and the number of people displaced due to conflict are all reminders to the general public as well as those involved in the delivery of health care of the interconnectivity and vulnerability of the world9s population. Students, residents, and physicians are eager to learn about and participate in global health but often have little understanding of where to begin. As such, BC Children9s Hospital (BCCH), in collaboration with medical students from the University of British Columbia (UBC), identified a need for the development of training experiences to help prepare health care students and professionals for effective and meaningful global health work. To provide the most beneficial training, there is a need to first understand the current level of global health background of students, residents, and faculty and to conduct a learning needs assessment to evaluate what kind of training would be most beneficial to them. Methods A working evening dedicated to global health education was held on March 31, 2006, which took the form of a panel of four speakers, followed by breakout focus groups. Focus groups were asked critical questions about the process by which a global health education curriculum would be offered. In addition to an evening focus group, a comprehensive on-line questionnaire was sent to all medical students and faculty in family practice, pediatrics, obstetrics/gynecology, and surgery to explore the subjects9 experiences in global health and categorical questions regarding subjects9 perceived needs for training and access to global health resources. Descriptive statistics for the study population will be analyzed. Main themes of the qualitative questionnaire data will be extracted and summarized. Categorical data will be tabulated and summarized to reflect subject responses to the needs assessment for global health education and resources. Conclusions A student-led steering committee specific for global health education is now in place. Grand funding has been awarded by the Vancouver Foundation and the Department of Pediatric Surgery at BCCH. A monthly hands-on global health education workshop has now evolved to address the key learning needs of students and faculty.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».