Environmental scan of infection prevention and control practices for containment of hospital-acquired infectious disease outbreaks in acute care hospital settings across Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
•Almost three quarters (70%) of sites reported having at least one outbreak in 2013, and ward closure was utilized in 44% of the sites.•Overcapacity was perceived to be the main limitation on the implementation of ward closure. Over three quarters of sites had an Overcapacity/Full Capacity Protocol (OCP/FCP), and 63% of those respondents reported that this protocol was used “frequently” or “continuously”.•Ward closure was considered as an appropriate strategy either in general by 50% or sometimes, under some circumstances by 45%.•Respondents who said that ward closure was “sometimes” appropriate indicated that it would be so only if other measures fail, after a risk assessment, or depending on the nature and extent of the outbreak.•Responses indicated that ward closure was generally used for acute and virulent enteric and respiratory outbreaks, but not outbreaks involving antibiotic resistant organisms (AROs). BackgroundWard closure is a method of controlling hospital-acquired infectious diseases outbreaks and is often coupled with other practices. However, the value and efficacy of ward closures remains uncertain.PurposeTo understand the current practices and perceptions with respect to ward closure for hospital-acquired infectious disease outbreaks in acute care hospital settings across Canada.MethodsA Web-based environmental scan survey was developed by a team of infection prevention and control (IPC) experts and distributed to 235 IPC professionals at acute care sites across Canada. Data were analyzed using a mixed-methods approach of descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.ResultsA total of 110 completed responses showed that 70% of sites reported at least 1 outbreak during 2013, 44% of these sites reported the use of ward closure. Ward closure was considered an “appropriate,” “sometimes appropriate,” or “not appropriate” strategy to control outbreaks by 50%, 45%, and 5% of participants, respectively. System capacity issues and overall risk assessment were main factors influencing the decision to close hospital wards following an outbreak.DiscussionResults suggest the use of ward closure for containment of hospital-acquired infectious disease outbreaks in Canadian acute care health settings is mixed, with outbreak control methods varying. The successful implementation of ward closure was dependent on overall support for the IPC team within hospital administration. Ward closure is a method of controlling hospital-acquired infectious diseases outbreaks and is often coupled with other practices. However, the value and efficacy of ward closures remains uncertain. To understand the current practices and perceptions with respect to ward closure for hospital-acquired infectious disease outbreaks in acute care hospital settings across Canada. A Web-based environmental scan survey was developed by a team of infection prevention and control (IPC) experts and distributed to 235 IPC professionals at acute care sites across Canada. Data were analyzed using a mixed-methods approach of descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. A total of 110 completed responses showed that 70% of sites reported at least 1 outbreak during 2013, 44% of these sites reported the use of ward closure. Ward closure was considered an “appropriate,” “sometimes appropriate,” or “not appropriate” strategy to control outbreaks by 50%, 45%, and 5% of participants, respectively. System capacity issues and overall risk assessment were main factors influencing the decision to close hospital wards following an outbreak. Results suggest the use of ward closure for containment of hospital-acquired infectious disease outbreaks in Canadian acute care health settings is mixed, with outbreak control methods varying. The successful implementation of ward closure was dependent on overall support for the IPC team within hospital administration. There have been more than 2,322 infectious disease nosocomial outbreaks filed in the Worldwide Outbreak Database based on articles published since 1966, which indicates the frequent and continuous occurrence of outbreaks across the globe.1Vonberg R.P. Weitzel-Kage D. Behnke M. Gastmeier P. Worldwide Outbreak Database: the largest collection of nosocomial outbreaks.Infection. 2011; 39: 29-34Crossref PubMed Scopus (49) Google Scholar An infectious disease outbreak is defined as the occurrence of more cases than expected of an infectious disease in a given area or among a particular group of people over a particular duration of time.2Alberta Health Services Guidelines for outbreak prevention, control and management in acute care and facility living sites. Alberta Health Services, Edmonton (AB)2015http://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/healthinfo/Diseases/hi-dis-flu-prov-hlsl.pdfGoogle Scholar Outbreaks occur frequently in hospitals and health care centers and pose a serious risk of colonization or illness to susceptible patients and health care staff.3Greig J.D. Lee M.B. A review of nosocomial norovirus outbreaks: infection control interventions found effective.Epidemiol Infect. 2012; 140: 1151-1160Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar, 4Harris J.P. Adak G.K. O'Brien S.J. To close or not to close? Analysis of 4 year's data from national surveillance of norovirus outbreaks in hospitals in England.BMJ Open. 2014; 4: e003919Crossref PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar In an effort to control hospital-acquired infectious disease outbreaks, many measures may be used, sometimes in combination, and include enhanced hygiene, isolation of infected patients, cohorting of cases and staff, visitor restrictions, and ward closures.3Greig J.D. Lee M.B. A review of nosocomial norovirus outbreaks: infection control interventions found effective.Epidemiol Infect. 2012; 140: 1151-1160Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar, 4Harris J.P. Adak G.K. O'Brien S.J. To close or not to close? Analysis of 4 year's data from national surveillance of norovirus outbreaks in hospitals in England.BMJ Open. 2014; 4: e003919Crossref PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar Hospitals providing acute care began publishing reports on the use of ward closure in an effort to control infections and communicable diseases more than 4 decades ago.5Noone P. Griffiths R.J. The effect on sepsis rates of closing and cleaning hospital wards.J Clin Pathol. 1971; 24: 721-725Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar Although there is no standard definition of “ward closure” and its use varies considerably, it usually involves some restriction of new patient admissions in some manner and is usually coupled with a bundle of other infection control measures, such as enhanced environmental services, rigorous hand hygiene, and enhanced surveillance to control transmission.6Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Key infection control recommendations for the control of norovirus outbreaks in healthcare settings.https://www.cdc.gov/hai/pdfs/norovirus/229110A-NorovirusControlRecomm508A.pdfGoogle Scholar During recent years, the value and efficacy of using ward closure to control hospital-acquired infection (HAI) outbreaks has been questioned because it is among the most expensive and disruptive infection prevention and control (IPC) measures that can be used.4Harris J.P. Adak G.K. O'Brien S.J. To close or not to close? Analysis of 4 year's data from national surveillance of norovirus outbreaks in hospitals in England.BMJ Open. 2014; 4: e003919Crossref PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar, 7Haill C.F. Newell P. Ford C. Whitley M. Cox J. Wallis M. et al.Compartmentalization of wards to cohort symptomatic patients at the beginning and end of norovirus outbreaks.J Hosp Infect. 2012; 82: 30-35Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar, 8Hansen S. Stamm-Balderjahn S. Zuschneid I. Behnke M. Rüden H. Vonberg R.P. et al.Closure of medical departments during nosocomial outbreaks: data from a systematic analysis of the literature.J Hosp Infect. 2007; 65: 348-353Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar, 9Illingworth E. Taborn E. Fielding D. Cheesbrough J. Diggle P.J. Orr D. Is closure of entire wards necessary to control norovirus outbreaks in hospital? Comparing the effectiveness of two infection control strategies.J Hosp Infect. 2011; 79: 32-37Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar Total closures of a ward, assuming 25 patients or more housed on the ward, can have a major influence on bed-days lost, cancellation of elective admissions, loss of capacity for emergency admissions with its attendant impacts on morbidity and mortality, and may be difficult to implement in health care facilities where lack of capacity is a problem, or in wards providing unique clinical services.9Illingworth E. Taborn E. Fielding D. Cheesbrough J. Diggle P.J. Orr D. Is closure of entire wards necessary to control norovirus outbreaks in hospital? Comparing the effectiveness of two infection control strategies.J Hosp Infect. 2011; 79: 32-37Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar Ward closures have historically been employed to curtail spread (by restricting admission of new, susceptible hosts) and thereby shorten the overall duration of an outbreak. In addition, ethical concerns when new patients are knowingly admitted into an area known to be experiencing ongoing spread of an infectious agent may factor into decision making regarding ward closure. Recent studies comparing the efficiency of ward closures to other, less expensive and less disruptive outbreak methods suggest that ward closures may not be necessary, depending on the setting and the type of microbe associated with the outbreak.9Illingworth E. Taborn E. Fielding D. Cheesbrough J. Diggle P.J. Orr D. Is closure of entire wards necessary to control norovirus outbreaks in hospital? Comparing the effectiveness of two infection control strategies.J Hosp Infect. 2011; 79: 32-37Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar This study was part of an effort to understand current evidence in the literature as well as practices on the use of ward closure across Canada in the event of an HAI outbreak, with the ultimate goal of informing the provincial policy on ward closure in Alberta. The first part of this work has been published as a systematic review.10Wong H. Eso K. Jones J. Kwon Y. Powelson S. de Grood J. et al.Use of ward closure to control outbreaks among patients in acute care a systematic 4: PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar The work is a environmental scan that was to a of the current practices regarding the use of ward closure to control HAI outbreaks in acute care settings in Canada. The of the environmental scan was to the of use of ward closure in acute care hospital settings to control HAI the and for the use of ward and on the and used by hospital IPC and other infection regarding and under circumstances ward closure is an appropriate of or in the control of HAI The team IPC experts who in a and manner to the and of the survey that would be most appropriate in the of this were from the Canadian for for Hospitals for of Health of Canada Canadian Scholar A of the survey was and and by of the study team to of the The survey was by the PDF to a of in of the survey a of to the the survey was to a more using The survey was a among experts to and issues The survey can be found in were an on of the to the survey an or by The survey was distributed to from IPC in acute care hospitals across Canada. were from from the Canadian and in the study by the for the for Health and During the Canadian of Health a total of hospitals in Canada. The of and An or to be used for of the The 25 who were to the were for 1 hospital only 1 was to in the survey 1 The survey was and data collection was completed after were to participants, were by who were for health care centers were to to the survey for the with the of were given the to other who the survey for the other health care The were by the study team and if were with an acute care for which a had not been from the were into and for the Health Services Guidelines for outbreak prevention, control and management in acute care and facility living sites. Alberta Health Services, Edmonton (AB)2015http://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/healthinfo/Diseases/hi-dis-flu-prov-hlsl.pdfGoogle Scholar from and in a of and which were analyzed analysis was using descriptive statistics with responses were by into thematic were to within the The were into the with which and were The were used in the to on the were analyzed to on that in the were and are in the The environmental scan survey on a of acute care hospitals that were the for the for Health and The survey was to a of An 25 were as a of a total of responses with completed in an overall of completed were because were responses from the 110 were in the analysis which of the 235 facilities The and data collection is in The of across was of that of the 5% 5% 5% and and was with the of This in may have been to a provincial and during the of the However, the survey a of responses than expected from Alberta and with be expected based on the if responses were of the of would and of respondents from Alberta and of respondents completed the survey for acute care sites with than for sites with for sites with for sites with and for sites with more than The of respondents for hospitals with or was that the responses hospitals in Canada with more than of hospitals with of hospitals with and of hospitals with than are based on Canadian of Health hospital which not include hospitals in and for Health Canadian hospital Scholar than of sites reported using an capacity protocol only when with of hospitals reported using the protocol and reported using it frequently A of responses was as to responses from hospitals with said that hospital or at a capacity in the emergency was such as 50% or hospitals reported the protocol when capacity was such as for a with and for a with than for an protocol during were when the of the of hospital with an admission of than depending on the was when the was in of and to 1 when the is in of to patient care and of are by patients that are under or assessment or of are by admitted said that is when and clinical decision are and there are admissions for respondents reported having a standard for with HAI outbreaks at and the or for with sites used to outbreaks or not had a standard for with The employed were and environmental services, enhanced and use of The least were and cohorting for these outbreak control were not in the survey because these interventions were not the of the and were who were expected to have a definition of these ward closure to some cohorting for cohorting is considered to be a than ward and to of patients infected or with the infectious disease to care to one area and with susceptible to the for Disease Control and for Disease Control and Prevention of resistant organisms in healthcare Scholar the 110 sites that were in the environmental 70% reported having had at least 1 outbreak during The most type of HAI outbreaks were those involving which at of sites that an outbreak. there was a of outbreaks of type in the survey respiratory and The of respondents indicated that the definition of “ward closure” used at hospital or was the or to that which was in the survey closure of a ward, or area within the that of the no new patients are admitted to the were no to other within the health care facility or to other health care facilities are for ongoing care a patient on a ward who and care be to an care and no to There were no on who reported in the definition of ward closure used at reported that not have on patient with support or to 1 hospital to admission and as as an but are for many sites to patients to the but not to respondents that were or not during ward which was not in the 44% of respondents of 110 reported that used ward closure as an HAI outbreak control strategy during 2013, and of those used closure of as an strategy to control outbreaks closure of the of the ward or of these respondents said that would not using ward closure for most care but care and care or care who not the use of ward closure for HAI outbreak control during if there were not use this In some there were no outbreaks and in other the outbreaks were with implementation of other infection control In 1 there was a to of reported that or hospital was not to use ward closure as an outbreak control influencing the to care for acute patients to capacity not close or in acute care as are at Ward closure responses showed that of sites had an outbreak during and used ward or closure as a had an outbreak but not use ward had outbreaks but were not ward closure was used or and the of sites not an outbreak respondents who reported use of ward closure at indicated that this strategy was used during of sites not have an outbreak during using ward or closure. The may have been reported in or ward closure may have been for or cleaning ward closure and outbreaks in across Canada ward or closure been used as an outbreak control strategy in this hospital during have an outbreak in facility during in a new The most of outbreaks that ward closure respiratory and by and other outbreaks such as group A and and of ward closure was more frequent in hospitals with to but among hospitals that used ward had than had had had and had more than However, the of sites that used ward closure within were 50%, and from to of hospitals with had used ward closure during the outbreak ward and protocol use by hospital that of ward and protocol use by hospital of of of closure of sites that indicated use for with in a new the of respondents reported that ward closure would be a part of outbreak management strategy in the but of reported that were 5% indicated that ward closure would not be part of outbreak management among the who had reported using ward closure during the said that this strategy would be a part of outbreak management in the for sites that not use ward closure during 2013, of respondents that ward closure would be a part of outbreak management in the the 50% ward closure to be an appropriate strategy for infection control in general and ward closure to be an appropriate strategy for infection control under some The for the use of ward closure indicated by are in as to ward closure is sometimes if other measures after other control measures have been and has that the cases are not closure can be to patient and thereby closure in for the patients for in the emergency or having to the would to be on nature and extent of the closure the of and but is for respiratory but only with ward duration outbreaks such as illness can be with ward closure. a and the is if wards are capacity would be to an outbreak if it were to close the to admissions, to for and the of patients at risk on the and the for the to However, given the capacity issues at this is not in a new In to more than of ward closure. The most are in of ward closure based on outbreak the more the and to patients or admitted to the on outbreak not to close wards as it more on the hospital and the is that support from the of the hospital to support infection prevention and control indicates is are developed with by the a the entire for the to the to to be and often have not the outbreak and are often of definition and and to be indicates that there is a for more and on the of infection prevention and in a new of ward closure based on influence on patient is in a which at patients to care and have a susceptible that remains on the the outbreak is are only hospital in the area so it is difficult to close is to a to patient from the emergency and to in as it is not of capacity for environmental to to be some lack of and health care in to isolation and outbreak for patients and not the or visitor has a effect on the of support for ward of of lack of and lack of admissions to a during an in a new This environmental scan has on the and regarding the use of ward closure the of IPC and across Canada. The area is in that no other published work in Canada has the of ward closure in HAI The for this survey to the and of this to outbreak control methods across Canada and within and but reported associated with HAI outbreaks and the control measures Although ward closure was used by than of respondents in 2013, the indicated 50% of respondents that ward closure was an appropriate strategy as an infection control in general and under some circumstances across Canada. that 70% of hospitals outbreaks to one may that most ward closures would be to survey found that most ward closures were to respiratory and is that hospitals were to ward closure from to a of The first is that may spread more than a respiratory or for more for containment of of the The is that to the spread of it is more to those outbreaks using such as and environmental services, enhanced and use of the at controlling the outbreak, depending on the a assessment may be and ward closure The reported frequent or continuous use of by respondents the issues of acute care use of acute care or the of care within the Canadian health care was to be an occurrence to with M. control Hosp Infect. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar The survey that has the new or standard for with at many Canadian or that capacity the use of outbreak containment The influence of on the to implement IPC measures that ward closure is not an to continuous for because of patient that and patient care over the use of ward closure. that ward closure is not an to continuous such as this that in some IPC are sometimes by is when this is in because risk assessment first and the influence on patient care and associated ethical such as the of new patients to an where is The the of admitted patients in Canadian emergency PubMed Scopus Google Scholar The is as health care a more A and approach to decision making that involves hospital may to a more when ward closure in the setting of HAI respondents in this study indicated an of the of IPC and risk assessment with respect to ward closure and the for a the to close a ward and of H. Eso K. Jones J. Kwon Y. Powelson S. et al.Use of ward closure to control outbreaks among patients in acute care a systematic 4: PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar An overall risk assessment is the risk for patients in the HAI outbreak admitted patients to this area as well as patients in an for of and patients to or patients to an that the of ward closure as an infection control strategy not only on the other IPC that are but on the and that to influence the and implementation of IPC some respondents reported having a team approach for to outbreaks that from of the hospital and its other respondents that had or no support across for the IPC team and its regarding to who reported support for ward closure indicated that this was to admission and factors to lack of support for ward closure the effect on patient and thereby overall patient care or over for patients for in the or having for the hospital to ward and on when is not and and are not there to with patient A study by et J. S. C. C. et from a and norovirus outbreak at a of the Hosp Infect. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar on a norovirus outbreak from can to the to control The the for data to the of the support within the of care that influence the influence of ward and sites of care can that acute care hospitals not the for and to capacity within acute care in in and other facilities to patients from outbreak in with is to use and patient within the of health The influence of these factors on the use of IPC A limitation of this survey was the of respondents across the team with the that were at the A would to a of hospitals across which was not at the of this the team used from the Canadian This in in the to from that such as and the in the data collection with in that was in the it was in the the Alberta was well in the and had an to the of respondents with the the factors may have in a and may the of the In to hospitals with than were in this This may have in an of the use of ward closure in because this strategy to be more in hospitals are more to outbreaks and often more patients with of illness who may be more to limitation was the for The may have if the survey was over a of with for IPC across and ward closure is no The survey found that closure of a ward in in restricting was not part of the study definition of ward closure and is not under some other hospitals as a part of the of ward closure. There may have been other, in that influence the ward closure to some be as cohorting by This would influence the because respondents were and ward closure. There may be in the of the of and the and associated with that Although the definition of outbreak is there can be to an outbreak for a of making a decision that a has been from or to can be in where and are This was in some and may have the of the study and of the This for the of responses where no outbreak was reported but ward closure was This environmental scan is a first to an of current and associated with HAI outbreak control in acute care hospital settings across Canada and to as to to and control is that factors and influence the decision to close a ward or in hospitals of and health the nature and extent of the outbreak, the to other IPC measures, patient as well as other factors into the
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».