MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2739088371 · doi:10.1353/jip.2017.0006

A Heartfelt Thank-You for the Opportunity to Serve and for Your Support

2017· article· en· W2739088371 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œjournal of individual psychology · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueCognitive and psychological constructs research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAudience measurementLibrary sciencePsychologySet (abstract data type)Public relationsSociologyManagementPolitical scienceComputer scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A Heartfelt Thank-You for the Opportunity to Serve and for Your Support William L. Curlette and Roy M. Kern We very much appreciate the opportunity to have served NASAP as coeditors of The Journal of Individual Psychology (JIP) for 18 years. Actually, we applied for the editorships in 1997 and began working on JIP in January 1998 before our editorships officially began, so from that perspective we have worked on JIP for 19 years. During that time we have edited 18.5 volumes, or 74 issues. The first issue we submitted as coeditors was Volume 55, Issue 1, and the last issue was Volume 73, Issue 2, although Volume 73, Issue 3, the second in a series of two issues with Jon Carlson as guest editor, was ready to be sent to the press for publication at the time we left the editorship at the end of January 2017. In the first issue we edited in spring 1999, we set out the following three goals in the Editors’ Notes: “to expand the base of contributors to the journal, to identify more specifically the needs of the readership, and to promote a team approach.” An additional goal we later articulated in our second issue was increasing research-based articles in Individual Psychology that employed quantitative and qualitative empirical methods. In addressing these goals, we received amazing support over the years from many people, including our managing editors, guest editors, NASAP leaders, graduate research assistants, administrators at Georgia State University, administrators and editors at the University of Texas Press, associate editors, reviewers, authors, and—last but not least—our readers. Through our editorial team, some of the ways we addressed these goals were by conducting a readership survey, creating standing columns, increasing the number of guest editors, increasing the number of reviewers (including international reviewers), distributing the full text of JIP through the electronic aggregators EBSCO and Project MUSE, and initiating use of Scholastica for managing manuscript submission and review. We also participated in a group for editors of psychology journals. [End Page 85] In our first issue, we reinstituted columns by creating the following seven columns in JIP, with leading Adlerians as column editors: Biopsychosocial Issues, Education: Teaching the Ideas, Family Interventions, Research, Business and Organizations, Psychological Strategies, and Reports and New Developments. Later, we expanded the scope of the Education: Teaching the Ideas column to become Education and Supervision. As of 2016, the distribution of JIP articles through EBSCO placed full-text articles in libraries in 126 countries, greatly increasing the dissemination of the theory and practice of Individual Psychology. When we negotiated and signed the original contract with EBSCO in 2002, we were able to have issues of JIP back to 1974 digitized and placed on the EBSCO website at no additional cost, and this made more than 25 years of back issues available electronically. As of fall 2016, the number of libraries with access to EBSCO is 2,666 in the United States, 287 in Canada, and 2,320 in other countries around the world. In 2014, we expanded electronic distribution through Project MUSE, which, during the 2015 calendar year, distributed JIP issues to 510 libraries in the United States and Canada and 1,142 libraries inter nationally. Also, Project MUSE allowed for full-text JIP articles to be available on the NASAP website for members of NASAP. Both of these aggregators provided additional financial support to NASAP and the editorial process. Throughout the process of making JIP articles available on the Internet, we owe a debt of gratitude for the help and encouragement we received from the University of Texas Press, and especially to Sue Hausmann, assistant director and journals manager at the Press, and Karen Broyles, production coordinator. In 2015, our managing editor, Jaclyn DeVore, encouraged us to use Scholastica, a platform for managing the communication process involved in journal editing over the Internet. Currently, using the Scholastica website, authors submit their manuscripts, reviewers receive and comment on manuscripts, and editorial decisions and other communications are transmitted. Early in our editorship, we joined the International Council of Editors of Psychoanalytic Journals and attended most of their yearly meetings. At these meetings, approximately 20 editors would...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,677
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,346
Tête enseignante GPT0,507
Écart entre enseignants0,160 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle