A Comparative Study of Teachers’Remuneration Systems between Republic of Korea and Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
이 연구는 한국과 캐나다의 교원보수체계의 비교를 목적으로 제도적 차원뿐만 아니라 교사처우와 교직에 대한 인식을 살펴보고 양국 현직 교사들의 직업관에 대해 알아보았다. 이를 위해 문헌 연구와 질적 연구를 병행하여 양국 교원보수체계의 지향점 및 이와 관련된 교사들의 인식을 분석•비교했다. 연구 결과 몇 가지 공통점과 차이점이 발견되었다. 첫째, 보수체계의 운영철학에서 한국은 국가 경쟁력 차원의 효율성을, 캐나다는 개인 위주의 능력계발을 중시했다. 둘째, 양국의 교원 보수체계의 공통적인 목표는 평등지향적인 합리적 교원보수제도의 확립이다. 그러나 평등에 대한 입장에서 한국의 경우 일반 공무원과의 형평성이 강조된 반면에 캐나다의 경우에는 성평등이 주로 거론되었다. 셋째, 교직에 대한 태도에서는 보수체계를 중심으로 두드러진 차이를 보였다. 한국의 경우 교직은 안정적이고 사회적으로 선망되는 직업이지만 진입장벽이 높고 보수체계가 상대적으로 경직되어 있었다. 반면에 캐나다의 경우 교직으로의 진입이 용이하고 보수체계가 유연하지만 이직 또는 겸직에 대한 고려가 빈번하고 사회적 지위가 유동적이라고 인식되었다.This study examines the social recognition of teachers’ treatment and teaching profession through the comparison and analysis of the teachers’ remuneration systems in the Republic of Korea(hereafter, Korea) and Canada. For this purpose, literature review and qualitative research were conducted. As a result of comparing and analyzing the orientation of teachers’ remuneration systems in both countries and perception of teachers, the following differences were found. First, in terms of the management philosophy of the remuneration system, Korea emphasized the efficiency of the national competitiveness dimension, while Canada focused on the interrelationship with development of individual-oriented competency. Second, although the remuneration systems for teachers in both countries are quite different, they have aimed at establishing a reasonable remuneration system, which considers equality in common. But the position on equality was different between the two countries. In the case of Korea, equity was considered by comparing the pay scale with those of other government employees, while equity in Canada mainly had to do with gender equality. Third, the teachers of both countries regarded the sense of duty and ethics as important qualities of the teaching profession, and they recognized the social safety net as an indicator of their social status. However, there was a difference in attitude toward the teaching profession. In Korea, it was deemed to be a stable and socially desirable profession, but the entry barriers were quite high and the remuneration system was relatively rigid. In Canada, on the other hand, it was easy to enter the teaching profession and the remuneration system was far less rigid. But teachers were more likely to quit or take a second job, and their social status fluctuated.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».