MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2741155318 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.871.871

"Outgrowing" the Laboratory Diagnosis of Type 1 Von Willebrand's Disease: A Two Decade Study

2016· article· en· W2741155318 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mouhamed Yazan Abou‐Ismail, Gbolahan Ogunbayo, Peter A. Kouides

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVon Willebrand diseaseMedicineVon Willebrand factorPopulationHemostasisRetrospective cohort studyInternal medicineBleeding diathesisGastroenterologyCohortPediatricsPlatelet

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: In the general population, von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII) levels are known to increase with age. However, in patients with bleeding disorders such as von Willebrand's disease (VWD), the effect of ageing is unclear. With a growing population of elderly patients with bleeding disorders, it is important to understand these changes and their effects on hemostasis, which may preclude the need for hemostatic therapy. The results of two prior studies conducted in the Netherlandsand Canada suggest that VWF levels increase with age in patients with VWD. Our study looks at the trends of VWF with age and the extent of normalization of levels in patients with Type 1VWD. It is the first to be conducted in a United States (U.S.) population, and the largest of its kind to date. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the medical records of 266 patients registered at the Mary M. Gooley Hemophilia Center between 1996 and 2016 with a laboratory (lab) diagnosis of presumed Type 1 VWD based on normal multimers and/or ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo)/VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) ratio ≥ 0.6. The diagnosis of VWD was based on symptoms of bleeding episodes in conjunction with lab data of either VWF:Ag level < 30 U dL-1 or VWF:RCo level < 30 U dL-1, whereas the diagnosis of "Low VWF" was made for levels between 30-50 IU/dL (per NHLBI definition). Lab diagnosis required two subnormal sets taken at a minimum of 2 weeks apart. We collected all their historically documented VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and FVIII levels over time. We excluded patients whose levels were followed for less than 5 years, and we excluded all lab data that were related to the effects of desmopressin, products containing VWF or FVIII, pregnancy, or other acute stress situations. The primary outcome studied was complete normalization of most recent levels, defined as both VWF:Ag > 50 U dL-1 and VWF:RCo > 50 U dL-1 on two consecutive occasions separated at least 2 weeks apart. Furthermore, we defined "possible normalization" if only the last set of levels was normal, and "partial normalization" if only one level (either VWF:Ag or VWF:RCo alone) became normal for two consecutive times. Results: A total of 125 patients were analyzed (n=125), with an average duration of follow-up of 10.4 ± 3.7 years (SD) between the first set of values obtained until the most recent. Forty-five patients (26.4%) initially met the criteria for Type 1 VWD, while 80 patients (73.6%) had Low VWF. In the VWD group, 20.0% patients exhibited complete normalization, 11.1% showed possible normalization, and 55.6% had no normalization. The Low VWF cohort had complete normalization in 36.3% of patients, and possible normalization in 35.0% of patients. The total population had complete normalization in 30.4% of patients (Figure 1). An additional 13.3% and 3.8% had partial normalization in the VWD and Low VWF cohorts respectively. Only five patients, all of whom had "partial normalization", exhibited "relapse" where a normalized level dropped again. None of the other normalization groups had any incidence of relapse over the studied period of time. Conclusion: Our preliminary findings suggest that in about one third of patients with Type 1 von Willebrand's disease or Low VWF, the VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo levels completely normalize on repeat testing with age, over an average period of 10 years. Our study population is the largest to date whose levels were followed over time, and appears to be the first in a U.S. population. The rate and degree of normalization with time, as well as correlation with bleeding symptoms, are still being investigated. This may help determine whether rescinding the lab diagnosis precludes pre-operative hemostatic therapy. At the very least, clinicians should consider repeat testing in their Type 1 VWD patients 5 to 10 years post initial lab diagnosis. Figure 1 Stacked columns showing percentages of complete, possible, partial and no normalization in the total, VWD, and Low VWF cohorts. Figure 1. Stacked columns showing percentages of complete, possible, partial and no normalization in the total, VWD, and Low VWF cohorts. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,019

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,260 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→