MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2742226295 · doi:10.1061/9780784480885.056

Using Risk Models and Automated Defect Characterization Algorithms to Convert PACP Data into Capital Upgrading Programs for ALCOSAN

2017· article· en· W2742226295 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePipelines 2017 · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Établissements canadiensResearch Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSanitary sewerData collectionProcess (computing)CLARITYTask (project management)Computer scienceCapital expenditureWatershedEngineeringSystems engineeringBusinessEnvironmental engineeringMachine learningFinance

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ALCOSAN provides regional wastewater conveyance and treatment for 83 municipalities in Alleghany County, PA. They own and operate approximately 90 mi of interceptor sewers and the 250 million gallon per day Woods Run Wastewater Treatment Plant. There are over 4,000 mi. of combined and separated collection sewers located within the ALCOSAN service area owned by the municipalities. Utilizing EPA’s Integrated Watershed Approach, large portions of the collection system are being regionalized to facilitate the development of a more efficient and equitable upgrading and long term operating model. Integrating data from such a diverse array of sources is a very challenging task. Maintaining a high quality data capture with such an immense condition assessment data set is both a challenge and essential component of fully understanding the technical and financial ramifications of the condition assessment process accurately and expeditiously. The condition assessment program in support of regionalization is a traditional CCTV data capture with defect characterization of the conveyance infrastructure and its appurtenances being carried out with NASSCO’s PACP and MACP data logging techniques. The data capture with PACP/MACP involves the recording of literally millions of observations and requires considerable innovation to process the data efficiently and in a consistent manner such that clarity of risk and upgrading priorities is maintained. A traditional WRc/ASCE MOP 62 Risk Model was initially developed to lay the foundation for establishing condition assessment priorities, intervention timing, and policy. The model used readily available surrogate data to develop overall cost factors (an indication of the direct and indirect cost of collapse without rehabilitation intervention) for each reach of sewer pipe with the entire conveyance system. To facilitate a consistent and common approach to condition assessment and rehabilitation rationalization amongst a diverse pool of reviewers and end stakeholders; the writers mapped out the desired roadmap from defect patterns to rehabilitation assignment in some detail with the aid of master algorithms that analyze the specific pattern of defects in each MH-to-MH reach to suggest an optimum rehabilitation work stream and work limits in the reach. While trained practitioners can modify the rehabilitation assignment in quality assurance (QA) review, the master algorithms have been very successful in attaining a consistent approach in rehabilitation assignment between reviewers and promote a transparency in policy to all stakeholders that is well aligned with best practice in rehabilitation selection. By attaching a cost estimating model to the defect database and integrating it with the prioritization model and intervention policy; the Owner is able to have an initial understanding of the financial ramifications of the defects, the nature of upgrading programs that are required and the optimum timing associated with the program; instantaneously upon QA of the condition data which is typically long before final QA reviews of the rehabilitation assignments. The paper provides an overview of the development of the risk model and of the innovative approaches utilized in rehabilitation rationalization from the Pilot Regionalization program that was carried out in 2015 and 2016.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,368
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,824

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,148
Tête enseignante GPT0,380
Écart entre enseignants0,232 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle