Ribavirin, an eIF4E Inhibitor, As a Potential Anti-Lymphoma Therapeutic - Preclinical and Early Clinical Data
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Ribavirin, an antiviral drug used to treat infections including respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), inhibits the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E). EIF4E exports key mRNA transcripts from the nucleus and is a critical factor for translation of mRNAs into protein. Prospective trials of patients treated with ribavirin indicate that the drug has clinical activity and expected molecular effects of eIF4E inhibition in AML including relocalization of eIF4E to cytoplasm and decrease in eIF4E levels (Assouline Blood 2009 and Assouline Haematologica 2015). We demonstrated in pre-clinical models including a PDX triple hit lymphoma that eIF4E is also implicated in the pathogenesis of lymphomas (Culjkovic-Kraljacic Blood 2016). To elucidate the mechanism of action of ribavirin in DLBCL, we conducted eIF4E-immunoprecipitation followed by RNA-sequencing (RIP-seq) in OCI-Ly1 cells to identify RNAs that bind to eIF4E. We integrated this data with the RNA-sequencing of ribavirin-treated OCI-Ly1 cells (vs. vehicle) to further characterize RNAs that are more likely to be decreased by ribavirin. We performed pathway analysis with this data and found several lymphomagenic eIF4E transcripts to be significantly reduced by ribavirin treatment including the BCR, epigenomic regulators, interleukin signaling (IL-6, IL10), DNA damage response elements, and components of the splicing machinery. This suggests that ribavirin interferes with critical pathways in proliferating DLBCL cells and may be active in lymphoma patients. After observing a patient with an aggressive, refractory transformed lymphoma (CLL to HL) demonstrate an objective response on imaging following administration of ribavirin for RSV in absence of concurrent chemotherapy, we retrospectively analyzed (with IRB approval) outcomes of lymphoma patients undergoing autologous or allogeneic SCT who received ribavirin for antiviral indications. We searched our institutional electronic record system and SCT database for lymphoma patients meeting prospectively defined criteria as receiving ribavirin within 6 months prior to or any time after SCT. Ten patients were identified including 5 DLBCL (1 transformed from CLL and another from FL), 2 HL (1 transformed from CLL), 2 FL, and 1 MCL. All were male and median age at lymphoma diagnosis was 54 years (range 35-64). Median number of treatments received prior to SCT was 4 (2-8). Four were deemed to have inadequate response (3 with PD and 1 with insufficient PR) after salvage therapy and were treated with bendamustine prior to proceeding to SCT (3 with an investigational high dose regimen). Responses to therapy immediately prior to SCT included 4 CR, 5 PR, and 1 SD. Six underwent allo SCT and 4 auto SCT. All patients received ribavirin for RSV (4 inhalational, 6 oral) with a median length of treatment of 10 days (5-15). Median interval between SCT and ribavirin was 5 months (-1 to 23). Nine of 10 patients are currently alive with no evidence of lymphoma with a median OS of 17.8 months (4.6-85.5) and median PFS of 11.1 months (2.4-63.8). These retrospective data from patients with refractory lymphomas treated with ribavirin as antiviral therapy (just prior to or soon following SCT) demonstrate lymphoma-related outcomes superior to those expected based on disease risk profiles (9 of 10 with ongoing CRs). We recognize the limitations of this analysis, as well as potential selection biases and other possible explanations for these findings. However, our observations, in conjunction with preclinical data on eIF4E inhibition, raise the intriguing possibility that ribavirin may have clinically meaningful anti-lymphoma activity. Further assessment of larger numbers of patients, and rationally designed prospective clinical studies of ribavirin are justified and planned. Table Table. Disclosures Martin: Acerta: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Teva: Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».