MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2743330538 · doi:10.1353/chq.2017.0025

Les personnages mythiques dans la littérature de jeunesse (Mythical Characters in Children's Literature) ed. by Nathalie Prince and Sylvie Servoise

2017· article· fr· W2743330538 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne Cirella-Urrutia

Notice bibliographique

RevueChildren's Literature Association quarterly · 2017
Typearticle
Languefr
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueThemes in Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNarrativeHistoryHumanitiesArtArt historyLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: L. M. Montgomery's Complete Journals: The Ontario Years 1911–1917 ed. by Jen Rubio Barbara Carman Garner (bio) L. M. Montgomery's Complete Journals: The Ontario Years 1911–1917. Edited by Jen Rubio. Toronto: Rock's Mills, 2016. Readers of the five volumes of L. M. Montgomery's Selected Journals have long been curious about what had been left out by joint editors Mary Rubio and Elizabeth Waterston. Complying with Montgomery's wishes to publish her complete journals seemed out of the question in 1985. To claim, however, as the blurb on the back cover of this third volume of the Complete Journals does, that "The original publication of Montgomery's journals in 1987 contained only a selection of her entries" is misleading. The first two installments of The Complete Journals published by Oxford University Press, The PEI Years, 1889–1900 (2012), and The PEI Years, 1901–1911 (2013), reveal, as does this volume, the restrictions imposed on the editors of The Selected Journals. According to L. M. Montgomery Online, the editors of The Selected Journals "were directed to abridge Montgomery's journal text by fifty [End Page 258] percent." The back cover of volume 1 of The Complete Journals asserts that "To save space and present an easily digestible, fast-moving narrative, passages describing Lucy Maud Montgomery's darker, more reflective moods and her religious and philosophical speculations were cut." This statement, however, is misleading since many of Montgomery's "reflective moods" and her "religious and philosophical speculations" were well represented in those volumes. Indeed, scholars perusing The Selected Journals discerned Montgomery's habit of copying verbatim passages from her journals into her correspondence with her pen pals Ephraim Weber and G. B. MacMillan. Furthermore, many of these passages addressed her religious beliefs and discussed philosophical matters. This is particularly true of her correspondence with Weber. The Selected Journals did fulfill Oxford University Press's stipulation that the editors cut the material by fifty percent, but Rubio and Waterston struggled to decide what to include and what to exclude, trying hard to make the half representative of the whole. Just what material was edited out? Rubio and Waterston faithfully indicated where ellipses in the text occurred (…), but one discovers how many complete journal entries were cut by consulting the list entitled Omissions (1: 416; 2: 435). For example, in volume 1 of The Selected Journals 1889 is complete; 1890 is missing eleven entries, and 1891 is missing eighteen entries, plus two ellipses in included entries; 1894, however, is missing seventy-seven complete entries. How do the old and the new compare? The passages omitted from volume 2 of The Selected Journals are really our main concern here. Did Montgomery have more to say about the 1917 Halifax explosion than the reaction that appeared in this volume? Were there further references to the Lusitania disaster that the editors omitted? Were extensive passages about Montgomery's religious faith and doubt unavailable to readers of The Selected Journals? In The Ontario Years one discovers that Rubio and Waterston had indeed included Montgomery's complete accounts of and reactions to both the Halifax explosion and the sinking of the Lusitania. The Selected Journals will continue to satisfy many readers. They are still widely advertised on the Web; Indigo Chapters carries all five volumes online ($25.00 Canadian each). I discovered this when someone asked me whether his copy of The Selected Journals would now become obsolete. Access to the Complete Journals does, however, offer readers many benefits. Situating notes at the bottom of each page, an editorial practice that Rubio and Waterston adopted in the first two volumes published by Oxford University Press, is an improvement over The Selected Journals, in which they appeared as paragraphs of runon notes organized by year and date. Jen Rubio, the editor of L. M. Montgomery's Complete Journals: The Ontario Years 1911–1917, leaves no stone unturned in identifying places, people, world events, and, most especially in [End Page 259] this volume, the battles of the Great War, the variety of recruiting efforts, and aspects of daily life on the home front during those turbulent years. Her comprehensive identifying and defining of items...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,404
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0150,004
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChildren's Literature Association quarterlyMême sujetThemes in Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207