Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Thomas Piketty Capital in Twenty-first Century Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2014Every so often, a book that shouldn't be winds up being a smash hit. Or, rather, becomes an unexpected success given that its subject matter is far from celebrity/political biographies, heart-throbbing romances, heart-stopping crime/spy novels or fatuous self-help books that pretty much define popular literary taste. Thomas Piketty's Capital in Twenty-first Century is such a book.Earlier examples might include John Kenneth Galbraith's The New Industrial State (1967) and Allan Bloom's The Closing of American Mind (1987). Agree with them or not, they became best-sellers and, though many of purchasers may not have actually read them, they did attract attention of countless critics and raised debates among innumerable media pundits and public intellectuals taking sides on important issues they addressed.Although it is fashionable to say that book publishing is in decline, books by economists, historians, psychologists and others do, in fact, frequently catch public's fancy and, in future, there may even be more of them topping best-seller lists, though for shorter periods of time and with proportionately less enduring public impact than in era before Internet.In any case, it is clear that Piketty's book has not only become a major international cultural phenomenon, but that it has potential to be around for a while, stirring up contrarian thinking on all sides of question of what is happening with or, perhaps, to economy.Brought down to its simplest elements, Capital in Twenty-first Century is an attempt to bring Karl Marx's three-volume capstone project, Das Kapital, up to date. It fails, of course, because it has neither ambition, nor breadth and depth or revolutionary zeal of original. Although I won't be around to pay off if I'm wrong, I don't think it will be read by critics as we segue into twenty-second century with anything close to passionate or even antiquarian interest that Marx's magnum opus attracts even today in what some people wistfully imagine to be post-Marxist era.That said, Piketty has not authored a minor, superficial, or insignificant book. Someone, of course, had to take up challenge of rehearsing Marx's project at roughly this time (about a century after his ideas inspired first successful revolution that bore his name), and this effort is certainly a meritorious attempt to fill need. It comes, of course, after collapse of Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and morphing of former Red China into a previously unexpected and currently dominant instance of an authoritarian style of Asiatic capitalism. It also steps up just as late of liberal democracies in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development experience yet another tack in their uncertain voyage to what Francis Fukuyama (1992) spectacularly prematurely called the end of history.From 1930s to 1970s, academic field of economics, government economic policy and standard practices of private sector were dominated by John Maynard Keynes and his erstwhile associates and followers. Keynes and Keynesianism became popular as a consequence of allegedly Great Depression. Most of intelligent and attentive public-whether formally trained economists or merely casual readers of business pages of substantial newspapers and current affairs magazines-grasped elements of Keynes' theory.Put simplistically, Keynes advocated relatively severe taxes in good times (the top marginal rate of personal taxation exceeded 90% during Eisenhower administration in United States) and endorsed considerable public spending in bad times. The idea was to flatten out business cycle which not only featured booms and busts, but seemed, with successive bouts of inflation and unemployment, to be building toward a definitive crash that might, so financiers, merchants and manufacturers of day feared, precipitate collapse of capitalism that Marx had cheerfully predicted. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».