MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2752237360

Professional Communications in the Public Sector: A Practical Guide

2017· article· en· W2752237360 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Howard A. Doughty

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œinnovation journal · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Policy and Governance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésApprenticeshipInternshipValue (mathematics)Public relationsPublic sectorWork (physics)SociologyLawManagementPolitical scienceEngineeringEconomicsComputer scienceHistory
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Ted Glenn Professional Communications in the Public Sector: A Practical Guide Toronto, Canada: Canadian Scholars' Press, 2014Bobby Siu Developing Public Policy: A Practical Guide Toronto, Canada: Canadian Scholars' Press, 2014It is axiomatic that children must learn to walk before they can run, and that we all must learn our alphabets before we can write words and whole sentences. There is even some evidence that politicians should have some experience in elected office or business executives should have spent time as managers before becoming CEOs. That doesn't mean that some people aren't quick studies and it certainly doesn't mean that vast, successful work history in one field isn't of great value and can't be seamlessly transferred to advantage when taking up a responsible position in another. Generally speaking, however, it is helpful either to have pertinent experience or, at least, to be willing to undertake a period of instruction as an apprentice in one's chosen trade. That's why lawyers must undergo a year of articling and doctors must complete an internship or a residency before qualifying as a practicing physician or a specialist. It's why bricklayers and plumbers must work as apprentices. In exceptional cases, a poet or novelist may become a fine university president and or a clerk in a patent office may become an unparalleled physicist. It just doesn't happen very often.To ensure that new recruits straight out of school or people hired from other kinds of jobs are given the best opportunities for success, most employers make sure that they are given a certain amount of the job training. Some may be assigned to a mentor. There may be orientation programs, voluntary or compulsory professional development programs. At the very least, there might be a thick manual, a thin pamphlet, a sheet of paper or an electronic list of dos and don'ts, so that a new employee who makes too many mistakes and is let go can be told on the way out the door: You should have read the instructions!For new public sector employers and employees, there is another option. At least for one set of inductees, the Canadian Scholars' Press has published two excellent introductions to the public sector: Ted Glenn's Professional Communications in the Public Sector and Bobby Siu's Developing Public Policy. They are on a list of seventeen guides that mainly address issues in education, health and social work-the helping professions. These two, however, are of broad enough scope and interest that they can be highly recommended for fledgling public sector professionals or for people changing jobs and requiring a solid practical basis in a new area of activity.Ted Glenn is Professor and Program Coordinator of Public Administration at Humber College in Toronto and a consultant in organizational learning, organizational development, and public sector capacity-building, in Canada and abroad. His Professional Communications in the Public Sector is a first-rate example of a how-to instruction guide that will be very useful for people wanting to learn public relations and corporate communications strategies, tactics and techniques. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,961
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,170
Tête enseignante GPT0,452
Écart entre enseignants0,282 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œinnovation journalMême sujetCanadian Policy and GovernanceTravaux en français237 207