MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2754733148 · doi:10.4103/ijo.ijo_702_17

Plication: How apt in application?

2017· letter· en· W2754733148 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pradeep Sharma, Nripen Gaur

Notice bibliographique

RevueIndian Journal of Ophthalmology · 2017
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineOphthalmology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The standard procedure for strengthening/tightening the muscles is resection, which involves the muscle being disinserted and reinserted back at the point of original insertion, after a part being resected.[1] This, however, makes it irreversible, vulnerable to muscle loss/slippage during surgery and, also compromises the anterior segment circulation. Another strengthening procedure involves the plication or the muscle tuck whereby the muscle is double breasted without disinsertion. However, the “muscle-to-muscle” tuck never acquired general interest probably due to the effect of “cheese wiring” leading to a loss of effect over time. Wright revived the interest by changing the technique from muscle-to-muscle to muscle-to-sclera and also demonstrating the relative preservation of anterior segment circulation and its immunity from getting lost in action.[2] Wright[2] insists on the muscle being folded “over the muscle” for better preservation of circulation but the muscle being folded “under the muscle” too has been described and to be safe in human subjects with the help of iris angiograms.[3] Filling defects were seen in all cases of vertical rectus tenotomies (3/3) as compared to 1/4 in the case of vertical rectus plication surgery and none of the cases (0/5) of horizontal rectus plication surgery. This is possibly due to the role of long posterior ciliary arteries, indicating a relative safety of the procedure on horizontal recti. Prabha, et al.[4] describe the comparative outcomes of standard resection procedure with plication of rectus muscles. The authors have shown comparable outcomes of both the procedures. The inflammatory changes have also been found to be comparable among both the procedures in the study. However, they have followed up for a maximum 6–8 weeks and have not described the long-term effects of the procedure. A study comparing the outcomes of plication versus resection showed similar and maintained results on comparing medial rectus resection to plication, but the lateral rectus plication showed 37% loss of effect over time.[5] Another recent study has shown plication to be less effective than resection procedure.[6] The authors have reported a higher rate of undercorrections and reoperations in the plication group. The authors also report a higher association of postoperative drift with plication and blame the use of absorbable sutures for inferior outcomes as the effect of plication may decrease once the sutures dissolve.[6] The other advantage of this procedure is its reversibility in the early postoperative period, and it can be done on adjustable suture for more precision.[7] This surgery can also be done as a minimally invasive strabismus surgery. A mini-plication of just the central 3-4 mm muscle fibers is also described and is easily adjustable too.[8] The current evidence points toward a slightly inferior outcome of plication surgery as compared to standard resection procedure. A long-term prospective study with a larger sample size and also an improved technique to prevent the postoperative drift and loss of effect would be needed to establish this procedure as an effective alternative to standard resections. About the author Prof. Pradeep Sharma is the Professor and Head of Section of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Strabismus and Neuro. Ophthalmology, Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. Prof. Sharma completed his medical and specialty training. MBBS (1979) and MD (1982) from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences. He attained advanced subspecialty fellowship training in Strabismus at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, USA and Richmond Eye Institute, Richmond, USA, awarded by the International Strabismological Association (2001). He is the Fellow of National Academy of Medical Sciences and was the first Asian to deliver the prestigious Knapp Lecture at the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, AAPOS at Vancouver 2016. Other awards to his credit include Col Rangachari Gold Medal (1984) and Dr Athavle Award (2002) of AIOS and named orations at several State Ophthalmological Societies. He is the visiting faculty and surgeon with Orbis International. His rich academic accomplishments include over 100 scientific publications and two books. Strabismus Simplified and Essentials of Ophthalmology. Prof. Sharma is an excellent teacher and a mentor and is elegantly balanced in work and life.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesIntégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,774
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,308
Écart entre enseignants0,278 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueIndian Journal of OphthalmologyMême sujetBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersTravaux en français237 207