Cohort Profile: Pregnancy And Childhood Epigenetics (PACE) Consortium
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Epigenetics refers to mitotically heritable changes to the DNA, which do not affect the DNA sequence, but can influence its function. Currently, DNA methylation is the most studied epigenetic phenomenon in large populations. It entails the binding of a methyl group, mainly to positions in genomic DNA where a cytosine is located next to a guanine, a cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) site (Figure 1). DNA methylation at CpG sites can influence gene expression by altering the DNA’s three-dimensional structure and interacting with methyl-binding proteins, consequently affecting the binding of the gene transcription and chromatin-modifying machinery. There are approximately 28 million CpG sites in the human genome. DNA methylation is a dynamic process that can be influenced by genetic factors, as well as by environmental factors such as diet, air pollution, toxicants or smoking.1–4 Hence, DNA methylation may be seen as linking the genome to the environment with respect to health and disease. Early development is a period of profound changes in DNA methylation and may, as such, be a critical period for environmentally-induced DNA methylation changes.4 Hence, this period is of specific interest for DNA methylation studies in relation to specific exposures and long-term health outcomes.1,4–6 Schematic representation of DNA methylation. The figure shows a double DNA strand on the top right, with CpG sites which are methylated by the addition of a methyl group (M). DNA is transcribed into messenger RNA (mRNA). DNA methylation can influence transcription either positively or negatively, depending on the location of the methylated site. After transcription, mRNA is translated into proteins. Adapted with permission from Felix JF et al.64 DNA methylation modifications in early life represent an important potential mechanism for studies on the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD). The DOHaD hypothesis suggests that exposure to an adverse environment in fetal life or early childhood leads to permanent changes in organ structure or function, which may have effects on later life health.7,8 Many associations of early life adverse exposures, such as maternal obesity, smoking, air pollution and suboptimal diet, with common diseases throughout the life course have been described.9–12 Long-lasting DNA methylation modifications may be an important mechanism linking early life exposures with outcomes in later life.13 Besides having a potential mechanistic role, DNA methylation may also serve as a biomarker of exposures or outcomes, even without it having a direct causal role in the process.3,14,15 For example, an environmental factor may cause both a change in phenotype and a change in DNA methylation, without a causal relation between the two. Also, a disease could cause a change in DNA methylation, rather than the other way around.15 The ability of methylation signals to serve as strong biomarkers of some exposures, such as maternal smoking in pregnancy, may complicate inference about the role in mediating health outcomes; measurement error correction may help in this regard.16 Various pregnancy, birth and childhood studies have recently initiated research on the role of DNA methylation in the response to environmental exposures and development of health outcomes. Individual studies usually have sample sizes too small to address this issue, but it can be studied in joint efforts of prospective cohort studies starting from early life onwards.1,17 The potential of collaborative efforts between large-scale prospective cohort studies has been demonstrated by the success of recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) which have shed light on the genetic background of common diseases as well as their risk factors. These GWAS are characterized by state-of-the-art genome-wide agnostic approaches in which millions of genetic variants are related to a particular health outcome, usually in the setting of large consortia combining the results of multiple studies, using meta-analysis. Common genetic variants have been identified that are related to birthweight, childhood obesity, respiratory phenotypes, atopic dermatitis and behavioural outcomes among others.18–25 In line with these approaches, recent developments enable analysis of hundreds of thousands of DNA methylation markers across the genome on a single array.26,27 The high-throughput and cost-effective nature of these arrays has made it possible for studies to measure DNA methylation across the genome (‘epigenome-wide DNA methylation’) in relatively large samples sizes. These data can be used in epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) to evaluate associations of DNA methylation at specific sites or regions of the genome with determinants and outcomes of health and disease. EWAS in pregnancy, birth or child cohorts specifically enable exploration of associations of early life exposures with DNA methylation levels in children, and of DNA methylation levels with specific growth, development and health outcomes. Recent study-specific EWAS have shown associations of DNA methylation levels in offspring with birthweight, maternal body mass index and maternal smoking.28–31 Large sample sizes are required to achieve optimal power in analyses of so many genomic sites, especially if the prevalence of the exposure or outcome under study is low. Collaboration between studies and combined meta-analysis of the available data are needed to optimize the use of resources and to increase the likelihood of detecting DNA methylation differences underlying the associations of early life exposures and health outcomes. This paper describes the global Pregnancy And Childhood Epigenetics (PACE) Consortium which, to date, brings together 39 studies with over 29 000 samples and DNA methylation data in pregnant women, newborns and/or children. Besides strongly increased power to detect associations, bringing studies together in the PACE Consortium for meta-analysis greatly decreases the risk of false-positive associations. The larger power also enables more detailed studies into potential causal roles of methylation, using a mendelian randomization approach for which large sample sizes are typically needed. In addition, a number of studies have measured DNA methylation at multiple time points from birth through childhood and/or in adolescence, which enables investigation into the persistence of differential DNA methylation signals over time. Also, the availability of information from studies with participants from various backgrounds in terms of ethnicity, location and living environment enables testing of identified associations across different settings and evaluation of heterogeneity of effects across study populations. The primary aim of the PACE Consortium is to identify differences in DNA methylation in relation to a wide range of exposures and outcomes pertinent to health in pregnancy and childhood through joint analysis of DNA methylation data. Secondary aims of the Consortium are to perform further functional annotation-based analyses, to attempt to assess causality of DNA methylation differences for child health phenotypes, to contribute to methodological development and to exchange knowledge and skills. In June 2013, an international group of studies focused on maternal and child health met at the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences to organize an EWAS meta-analysis on maternal smoking in pregnancy and DNA methylation in newborns and children.32 This marked the start of the PACE Consortium. The success of this initial effort resulted in the expansion of the Consortium and inclusion of additional research groups, to include additional exposures and outcomes. The PACE Consortium is modelled after successful GWAS consortia, in which many PACE the Early the Early and Consortium and the for and in Currently, the PACE Consortium 39 studies with genome-wide DNA methylation data from pregnancy, or childhood samples and information on at of the exposures or outcomes of of studies in the PACE Consortium with study information is shown in detailed of the cohorts can be in the and available at The PACE Consortium is an dynamic and additional research are to of studies in the PACE Consortium with study information not study refers to the underlying study from which the EWAS of studies in the PACE Consortium with study information not study refers to the underlying study from which the EWAS The Consortium structure is The in the Consortium is strongly can an are by or more from different This and exchange of knowledge and for both and most or the under the of a more from their or The group as the meta-analysis for a specific For a group is and studies can into or of that specific are to a analysis which inclusion and phenotype and usually or cohort its and of the EWAS data. have shown a influence of different between cohorts on the results of EWAS cohort analyses its data to the analysis after which the results are with the meta-analysis exchange is for usually through These results include the and sample for CpG In meta-analysis of results is the approach and data are between the data approaches may be on and which may for but such approaches have not been used so the meta-analysis of the results and with specific meta-analysis such as include of the of and across and of cohort and meta-analysis The process of and meta-analysis is by an from of the other studies as a a as many studies as possible are in the meta-analysis to increase power to DNA methylation of is in further studies that to in the if After the meta-analysis is further is in terms of and of the analyses using available and analyses (Figure such a of the in of different than in the For example, after a analysis in a of the in childhood and samples may be to study persistence of the identified of the in the PACE Consortium are by the are by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences in and analyses are in which In addition, analysis may have if needed. The PACE Consortium brings together a large number of of with 1). studies have data and Many of the cohorts have multiple time points from fetal life into and have into or early have information on maternal exposures pregnancy, maternal smoking and body mass number of studies also information on more specific exposures, such as air cohorts have information on child and/or studies have a particular such as and or but most are cohorts a of data on many These include and respiratory as well as childhood of data and sample in studies can be in The PACE Consortium is focused the common methylation to the PACE Consortium on a are not in PACE with their but rather or not It is possible that a particular study is not in a PACE on a specific for to a or are in on that In such studies of the and are not the is sample and data expansion in increased DNA methylation and phenotype be available in the cohorts have of DNA methylation, and on the persistence of DNA methylation signals are of outcomes and enable specific developmental or life course analyses in relation to DNA methylation are in the and studies in the PACE Consortium have common of DNA methylation. the used by the group is the the most used in large-scale human studies a studies using this can be in the Consortium in the The 000 DNA methylation sites, than of sites across the genome. It is at and CpG and sites on of an international group of DNA methylation The PACE Consortium on exposures pregnancy and childhood health outcomes. studies, a number of exposures and outcomes are available and studies usually in multiple The exposures that the PACE Consortium on are the outcomes are childhood health and is in have methodological such as and evaluation of for methylated Many of the studies in the PACE Consortium also have GWAS data and other of and if the for The availability of GWAS data enables analyses of associations of genetic variants with DNA methylation, as well as analyses to assess the potential influence of genetic on methylation the possible causal role of DNA methylation differences using a mendelian randomization and for genetic markers of exposures, outcomes and methodological in the PACE Consortium. number of the cohorts in the PACE Consortium have EWAS on various phenotypes, maternal smoking, maternal body mass maternal and child and PACE on these studies have between a of the PACE In addition, of the PACE Consortium have to methodological developments in the such as evaluation of of study and analysis are or to the The large PACE Consortium meta-analysis on the results of a meta-analysis on maternal smoking in relation to DNA This meta-analysis of EWAS on maternal smoking pregnancy in with a of There methylated CpG sites in relation to maternal smoking pregnancy, after multiple testing correction using a of of which not been identified for their association with either maternal smoking pregnancy or smoking in This analysis the increased power by large of that most of these DNA methylation signals at birth into but are number of the methylated CpG sites in or with roles in diseases with maternal smoking, such as and also in developmental The a meta-analysis of the association of maternal levels pregnancy among newborns from methylation of CpG sites related to with most of these having in The most recent meta-analysis the results of an of the association of air pollution exposure and DNA methylation in It that exposure to pregnancy with differential offspring DNA methylation in as well as in in of these associations also to of from the PACE Consortium can be analyses can DNA methylation sites, in a brings it sample the of and the use of it the potential for analyses of DNA methylation signals at various throughout childhood and this setting it possible to effects between different and a setting of across studies, the of false-positive results from EWAS analyses in pregnancy, birth and child cohort studies an potential to shed light on underlying the associations of fetal and childhood exposures with later life health and and on a potential role of DNA methylation as a biomarker of exposures or outcomes. The data from early life enables to study the role of DNA methylation in life course health the and backgrounds of the PACE and enables of and to methodological and exchange of knowledge and skills. The of many PACE in consortia, with the studies, of at the start of the PACE Consortium. that may have to consortia, such as between studies, and of the of this the Consortium also for and in their on recent in GWAS consortia, that the PACE structure can be a for both and to for for that additional analyses of exposures or outcomes. to many other consortia, the PACE Consortium has or other than the from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences for the and the to of epigenome-wide DNA methylation particular methodological the analyses in the PACE Consortium are mainly on DNA from which are in may have its methylation DNA methylation in not represent DNA methylation in other that may be more for phenotypes, for the association of DNA methylation and This of DNA methylation studies in a in the of the cohort studies not be to more specific with the of be with other in the to be to address of PACE cohorts have DNA methylation measured in the of in samples in response to a range of and factors, such as diseases and DNA methylation is an association of an exposure or an outcome with DNA methylation may be the of changes in rather than a representation of a for in studies using data is a have used the of and which recently has been to the available of data in of This has been shown to be suboptimal in in DNA from PACE on for as in but in factors to be into in the In addition, by or which has on in to be in EWAS and may the of the Consortium and the number of studies that may be in a it can also be a in terms of and time to studies to and analyses with additional or on a particular factor such as to study associations in more as outcomes or disease may also influence DNA methylation, the potential for causality to be into especially in even if a disease differences in DNA methylation, these may serve a as biomarker of the disease or its epigenetic biomarkers may be used in disease as a in specific disease or in on the used DNA methylation arrays of the number of DNA methylation sites, with a on and CpG the of the be relatively the of DNA methylation data with other data to into their also both in terms of and in terms of of these methodological is the of this but these are of and the PACE the studies in the PACE Consortium are located in environmental exposures in and settings be for a more of epigenetic PACE is an to be to include studies from in the There is to in the of The efforts by this Consortium and many other represent the in the of the role of DNA methylation in health and disease. from EWAS do not on their results from to be by investigation of the between DNA methylation and gene of the roles of on outcomes and of causality between exposures and DNA methylation. results from may analyses of DNA methylation in human Many methodological to be The PACE Consortium a strong to address these points and to contribute to the of in the The PACE Consortium is an and studies in in or more analyses are to cohort analyses its data and and for CpG are for the meta-analysis. for to data from cohorts in the PACE studies can be through the study and or through with study in in the PACE Consortium can the of this be made in with For more data are available at in a The PACE Consortium is an that brings together studies with epigenome-wide DNA methylation data in pregnant women, newborns and/or children, with the aim to using differences in DNA methylation in association with a wide range of exposures and outcomes related to health across the life Currently, the 39 studies with over 29 000 samples with epigenome-wide DNA methylation data. is on a to include exposures and maternal such as maternal body mass diet, air pollution, maternal diseases and under study include childhood and obesity, and respiratory and in can the and of this For more The and the and the of for The for which large-scale methylation by the and Sciences and epigenetic on the cohort by the and the of and the and the National Institute of and and The role in study data and to or of the The cohort by the the in of the of a collaborative the for the in at the and the to by the for on Childhood and the and and is by is by the National and the The study by the and and and The study and research the of the specific of and of the and the the under and the This not the of the and in way the in this The role in study data and to or of the The by the and has from and for this by and for in the of of National Institute for Health National Institute for Health association for the study of and The birth cohort is by the and by of the The methylation by the by the of the under has a from is by the The study and by the of the of and for and and of and The methylation by the that to is the of the and of a by the and the Institute for is of a in the of biomarker The study in by from the the National of the National and Institute the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences the National Institute on Health and Health the National Institute of Sciences the The birth cohort by an of and by the of and Health This methylation in the cohort by the and The is made possible by from the the and the for Health and The EWAS data by a to from the for Consortium for and by from the of the of This study from the research and The EWAS data by a from the National Institute of and a from the for Health and and a from the has from the research and under has from the for and an from the has from the for and of the of and and the for number from the by a a Institute of Health a and a has an Early a from for the by the of DNA methylation data by the which is by the and the of is by the has from the National Institute of Environmental Health National of Health of the epigenetic studies in from of Health of the of and and in Consortium cohort by the National Institute of and The cohort have been by the National of Health and and The cohort by analysis in by and and have from the National Institute of Health and and The and is by the of Health and and the of and and and are by the of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and The in in by a from the under and from the and the to data analyses by and the Childhood Consortium and by the Epigenetics at the for on by the from to and also by the by the of and international This research by the of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences The study by and and and have from the National Institute of Environmental Health from of of Health and National Institute for Health and Institute of has from the research and under has from the research and under has from the of for this The and The study by the for Health and the for the the of and the and the of and analyses by a collaborative by the under the Health of the number The study and by the National for and and by the of Health and The methylation by the The has been by the of for health of the and the the the and the the and and the to of the study by the of has from the of and of for the cohort under and The cohort is by and to the of the the of and Health the the and and for for the of the The for the methylation through the National Health and from the National Health and is by from the National Health and and the National Institute of The by for specific and the of Health of of and in children, in of Environmental for and The methylation by the by the National of Health The study is by the for and and the methylation by by the through the for research on in the And Sciences number by the the in at the and and the are to the in this the for their help in and the which and research and to and for their to the of data methylation to the for their in the In addition, to and at the for as well as at for genome-wide methylation and for The on resources by through for under are to the and to from and and and and group at the of of the and for their of the and the DNA methylation data at the of The Childhood and and and and of and Health of and and Health Health for the of Institute of and of and and and of and of to to and at the and the of Health for their and The and/or data used in this study from the The of Health is not for the results or by the of this are to the and in of the study for their and especially to the of the health testing for their the and study in for sample and the for the methylation The analysis for is the of a et of the the study participants and for their in this The the and as well as the of the and the of the of in The for and the of and for in the and analysis of the data at the and the of for their and in and related The the and their for their and the and for their The also the of and of for their in the methylation and the group of at the for in particular for the the and the health and for their and in are to the in the the and for their help for and measurement of and the from the The is by the in with the of and of Sciences of the the Health the and the the of and and in The and of the methylation data for the by the of the of the of The and for their help in the EWAS and the analysis The the in pregnancy at the and the of research for and for the study at the of also the research in for of at of in as a study the National The of this cohort on a from the National for the National from the the the of and the and have in the also the of of and the for their and to the participants for their of the can be at to to the and their The cohorts the help by the at the and by for data and from the of in DNA methylation data and for sample greatly the of the in birth cohort and the are to the in in the cohort also of of and of the National Institute of for their and data and for in the and analysis of the data at for in the the and other of the Epigenetics also the and for their the of the participants in the and study and the of the participants in the study and the to the that in as well as the in and data The the and their for their The also the and for their and for data to the in this to the for their help in and to the which research and The for and the of and for in the and analysis of the data at the and their for also the research research and in the are to the and for their to the participants for their in the study and the for study and data of the participants of the study and the and for their and to this The for and the of and for in the and analysis of the data at to the that in the as well as the and research in and data to of the for their help and samples and to of the for Epigenetics for the methylation are to the and their in this the and the which research and data and research and also to the sites for their for of from the and the for the studies in this and from The and the
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».