MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2755541632 · doi:10.1353/crc.2017.0046

Vision and Self-Consciousness in The Picture of Dorian Gray

2017· article· en· W2755541632 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hao Li

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian review of comparative literature · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueModernist Literature and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPortraitGray (unit)ConsciousnessFellArt historyIllusionArtPsychoanalysisLiteraturePhilosophyPsychologyCartography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Vision and Self-Consciousness in The Picture of Dorian Gray Hao Li In Chapter Seven of The Picture of Dorian Gray, Dorian returns home after severing his relationship with Sybil Vane and aimlessly wandering around the town during the night. He is heartbroken that Sybil, once an artist who self-consciously performed her roles, is now merely acting out her own personality. Entering his house, his eye "fell upon the portrait Basil Hallward had painted of him" (Picture 89), and the expression of the portrait is different from what he remembers: The quivering, ardent sunlight showed him the lines of cruelty round the mouth as clearly as if he had been looking into a mirror after he had done some dreadful thing. He winced, and, taking up from the table an oval glass framed in ivory Cupids, one of Lord Henry's many presents to him, glanced hurriedly into its polished depths. No line like that warped his red lips. What did it mean? He rubbed his eyes, and came close to the picture, and examined it again. There were no signs of any change when he looked into the actual painting, and yet there was no doubt that the whole expression had altered. It was not a mere fancy of his own. The thing was horribly apparent. (Picture 90) Dorian's struggle to understand the nature of the change in the portrait, whether illusion or fact, justifies recent critical interest in Wilde's conception of consciousness in this novel. Critics have read Dorian Gray in the context of late nineteenth-century theories of the material nature of the mind, especially the empirical and positivist approaches that dominated late Victorian thought.1 In this paper, I shall argue for the importance of examining Wilde's conception of self-consciousness rather than consciousness per se. In the above scene, Dorian's viewing of his portrait differs from him seeing his face in the regular mirror, the oval glass; for Dorian, scrutinizing the portrait is primarily a self-conscious act. There were "no signs of any change," and yet the changed expression is "apparent" to his mind; it is something invisible but [End Page 565] present. In addition, if the changed expression is not merely apparent, but "horribly" apparent, Dorian's viewing of these invisible changes points to a form of awareness that is not simply bodily nor simply metaphysical. How these two aspects relate to each other forms the focus of this paper. The ensuing self-consciousness, as I shall argue, depends on both sensory feelings and reflexive evaluation as performative agents of cognition. Another reason for exploring this configured form of subjectivity is to reconsider our selection of contextual references. Apart from Wilde's interest in nineteenth-century naturalist epistemology, we may also need to take into account his more metaphysical interests; therefore, instead of drawing on only British scientists such as Herbert Spencer, Charles Darwin, T.H. Huxley, and W.K. Clifford, or only European philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, Spinoza, Hegel, and Nietzsche, I shall focus on a few meeting points of these two major strands of thought. Wilde's position should help us map out historically some of the challenges that European philosophy faced in late Victorian England, as metaphysical interests interacted with a distinctly material and positivist ethos, particularly concerning theories of the mind. Viewing the Intellect Dorian looks into the oval glass to see if there have been any changes to his face. These bodily changes would account for the altered expression in his portrait, and thus provide a persuasive and verifiable cause for that impression. The direction of his observations is from the mirror to the portrait, from factual evidence to something artistic and unexplainable. Here, the portrait serves as a metaphorical and fantastic mirror. In revealing a different expression of Dorian, but initially denying him any traces of epistemological lead, the portrait forces him to give up briefly his reliance on an empirical episteme. It reveals how the visible, as a material presence, may work with the invisible, which the senses alone can access but cannot sufficiently verify. Indeed, Dorian, "[l]ike Gautier," as the narrator of The Picture of Dorian...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,005
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian review of comparative literatureMême sujetModernist Literature and CriticismTravaux en français237 207