Introduction to the special issue on SysMus16.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
SysMus16, the 9th International Conference of Students of Systematic Musicology, was held at the University of Jyvaskyla in June of 2016. SysMus came to Jyvaskyla on a rather short notice, a bit like a surprise guest. It had chosen us, so to say. Nevertheless, we were enthusiastic about the chance to host SysMus and welcome young, motivated scholars from around the world to our little town high up in the North. After the first SysMus in 2008 in Graz, Austria, the conference has traveled around Europe and Canada, with the 2016 meeting being the first SysMus held in the Nordic countries, which made us especially proud to host the meeting.SysMus is a conference series for students-mainly at master's and doctoral level-of research areas related to systematic musicology. Because SysMus promotes systematic musicology as an interdisciplinary field that aims to study music from computational, psychological, sociological, and other nontraditional perspectives, attendees bring wide and versatile backgrounds in fields such as music perception, cognition and psychology, music information retrieval, music sociology, ethnomusicology, music education, and music therapy. SysMus gives young academics the opportunity to meet, present, and discuss their work with their peers and to participate in an international scientific event.More than 100 participants from 13 countries attended SysMus16, attending 50 oral and poster presentations. Besides delegate presentations, three distinguished senior colleagues, Prof. Mari Tervaniemi from the University of Helsinki, Finland (who has provided a summary of her keynote for this Special Issue), Prof. Justin London from Carleton College, United States, and Prof. Ralph Spintge from the University of Music and Drama, Hamburg, Germany, were invited to give keynote speeches on aspects of music perception, cognition, neuroscience, therapy, and medicine. Furthermore, members of the host department gave hands-on workshops on equipment, tools, and techniques developed and practiced at the institution, including motion capture, music information retrieval, heart-rate variability tools, vibroacoustic therapy, and active music therapy.Not only is SysMus a forum for young scholars to experience being at a conference, it also gives young scholars the opportunity to organize a conference. The organizing committee of SysMus16 consisted of 10 bachelor's, master's, and doctoral students from seven different countries and four senior members from the Jyvaskyla Music Department. Students participated in all the necessary steps, from making a budget and applying for funding to creating the scientific and social program attending to all the necessary details.SysMus16 is the first to present a Special Issue of selected conference papers. This special issue reflects the diversity of the presentations at the conference including papers on music perception, music psychology, music and movement, music education, and music therapy. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,031 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».