The Canadian Horror Film: Terror of the Soul ed. by Gina Freitag and André Loiselle (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
THE CANADIAN HORROR FILM: TERROR OF THE SOUL Edited by Gina Freitag and Andre Loiselle Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015, 302 pp.REVIEWED BY MURRAY LEEDERIn the minds of many, the Canadian horror film begins and ends with David Cronenberg. With no disrespect to the Baron of Blood, Canadian cinema has managed a diverse and often cutting-edge body of horror films for decades now. Certain other films (notably Black Christmas (1974), Ginger Snaps (2000) and Pontypool (2008)) have attracted academic attention, but a great many others remain relatively unexamined. The only books to examine Canadian horror films broadly are the two editions of Caelum Vatnsdals They Came From Within: A History of Canadian Horror Cinema (2004,2014) and though certainly valuable their thoroughness, these are more (self-admittedly) works of fan scholarship more than academic texts. So the new collection The Canadian Horror Film: Terror of the Soul is a welcome book for opening up the field. Editors Andre Loiselle, Professor of Film Studies at Carleton University, and Gina Freitag, the founder of the horror-oriented Cellar Door Film Festival Ottawa, have assembled an impressively diverse slate of contributors. Some are university-based academics, of course, but others include the aforementioned Vatnsdal, a director as well as a writer; film programmer/writer Kier-La Janisse, and a number of other writers whose works have appeared non-academic venues like Rue Morgue magazine and the website Canuxploitation.com (including its founder, Paul Corupe). A citation-free piece on Canadian monsters by Vatnsdal coexists with more conventional academic papers and this multiplicity of approaches is among the collection's greatest strengths.The diversity of writers is matched by the diversity of subjects. While plenty of the canonical Canadian horror films (including Cronenberg s) are covered, there are many topics here that will surprise even aficionados. The Canadian Horror Film is sorted into six sections with topics ranging from the shaping of the Canadian horror landscape to film adaptations, the tax shelter era, ecohorror, and, most usual, a section on animation and the avant-garde. Some of the essays engage overt boosterism (Loiselle trumpets Sur le seuil (2003) as, in my opinion, the best horror film ever made Quebec (81), but the entire thrust of the project is a recuperative one, identifying with pride a varied and valuable horror tradition Canada. The editors are explicitly polemical: wish to assert that after fifty years of commercial filmmaking, Canadian cinema should no longer have to apologize for itself. . . [we] choose to take a stand and declare that Canadian cinema does exist and that it has developed its own generic traditions. We unapologetically claim that if Halloween matters, then so does Shivers (16). This is a noble goal indeed.An impressive feature of The Canadian Horror Film, creditable to its editors, is its coherence as a collection, doubly so since its breadth stretches into avant-garde cinema, animation, and other topics rarely discussed as horror. Many of the chapters make reference to other chapters, and the conclusion by Freitag and Loiselle dedicates itself to collecting all of the threads of the various essays. The editors begin with a quotation from Northrop Fryes The Bush Garden (1970) concerning a particularly Canadian horror related to fear of the wilderness and obsessive interiority: confronted with a huge, unthinking, menacing, and formidable physical setting - such communities what we may provisionally call a garrison mentality (qtd. 3). Fryes text, along with Margaret Atwoods Survival (1972), serve as touchstones for a great many of these essays, providing a theoretical architecture that spans much of the collection, locating the terror of the soul in the interval between external threat and internal dread (4). Several of the essays productively pursue this framework into Canadian cinemas relationship with the Othered indigene (as does Aalya Ahmad her essay on Ginger Snaps Back (2003)) and into eco-criticism (Freitags essay on Canadian eco-horror and Peter Thompsons compelling reading of Orca: The Killer Whale (1977), which he recuperates from its usual dismissal as a Jaws (1975) knock-off). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».