MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2758897104

Permafrost thaw induced changes to runoff generation and hydrologic connectivity in low-relief, discontinuous permafrost terrains

2017· article· en· W2758897104 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ryan Connon

Notice bibliographique

RevueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueClimate change and permafrost
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPermafrostSurface runoffTerrainGeologyHydrology (agriculture)AggradationGeomorphologyEnvironmental sciencePhysical geographyEarth scienceGeotechnical engineeringGeographyCartographyFluvial
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Recent climate warming in northwestern Canada is occurring at an unprecedented rate in recorded history and has resulted in the widespread thaw of permafrost. Where present, permafrost exerts a significant control on local hydrology, and disappearance of permafrost threatens to change the hydrology of northern basins. In the peatlands that characterise the southern distribution of permafrost in low relief terrain, permafrost takes the form of forested peat plateaus and is interspersed by permafrost-free wetlands (i.e. channel fens and flat bogs). Previous field studies have found that channel fens serve as the drainage network and route water to the basin outlet, whereas flat bogs have been viewed primarily as storage features. Wetland expansion in response to permafrost thaw can transform the primary hydrologic function of flat bogs from storage units to runoff-producing units by removing the relatively impermeable permafrost barrier that encompasses them. As a result, permafrost thaw has the potential to greatly increase the runoff contributing area when large storage features form hydrological connections with the basin drainage network. It has been well documented that permafrost thaw in this region results in the loss of forest and a concomitant expansion of wetlands, however the hydrologic response of these changes is poorly understood.\nStream flow records in four Water Survey of Canada gauged basins (152 - 2050 km2)in the lower Liard River valley were analyzed to determine the impact of permafrost thaw-induced land cover change on basin runoff. Annual runoff between 1996 and 2012 increased by between 112 mm and 160 mm and these changes were significant in all four basins (p>0.05). Changes to stream flow were assessed using the Mann-Kendall non-parametric test and the Kendall-Theil robust line. Permafrost thaw between 1977 and 2010 was quantified by comparison of historical aerial photographs and high-resolution satellite imagery (World View 2) over a 6 km2 area of interest, where changes in tree-covered terrain were used as a proxy for permafrost loss. It was found that land cover change from forest to wetland was the most important factor contributing to the increases in runoff (37 -61 mm), and that basins with a relatively high cover of flat bogs were subject to the largest increases in runoff.\nThis analysis examined increases in runoff contributing area when a direct connection was formed between wetlands. Field studies have indicated the presence of ephemeral drainage channels connecting flat bogs within a peat plateau-bog complex. These drainage channels cut through the peat plateaus and create a series of cascading bogs that ultimately discharges into the channel fen. The bog cascades can greatly increase the runoff contributing area of a basin when the cascade is hydrologically active. To investigate the transport of water through these features, two bog cascades were instrumented with sharp crested v-notch weirs and cut-throat flume boxes in 2013 and 2014. Within the peat plateau-bog complex, the two cascades had markedly different plateau:bog ratios, and therefore different contributing areas. Runoff between the two cascades varied significantly with one cascade producing 125 mm of runoff over the two year period and the other producing only 25 mm. Both cascades were active during the snowmelt period of each year, however only the cascade with the higher plateau:bog ratio produced runoff in response to rain events. It is proposed that the bog cascades operate under an “element threshold concept’, whereby in order for water to be transmitted through a bog, the depression storage capacity of that bog must first be satisfied. This work suggests that neglecting to represent these cascades of connected bogs in numerical models can underestimate basin stream flow by between 10 and 15%.\nAt the southern distribution of discontinuous permafrost, the rate of permafrost thaw has increased in recent years. This research demonstrates a mechanism whereby permafrost thaw may show a non-linear response to warming air temperatures. Measurements of active layer thickness (ALT) are typically taken at the end of summer and inherently assumed to be analogous to maximum thaw depth. By definition, the active layer is the layer above permafrost that thaws in the summer and freezes again in winter. In Subarctic Canada, field measurements conducted at the end of winter found that the entire thickness of ground atop permafrost does not entirely re-freeze. This results in the formation of a thin talik between the frozen active layer and permafrost, and indicates that ALT must be measured by the depth of re-freeze. As talik thickness increases at the expense of the underlying permafrost, ALT is shown to simultaneously decrease. This suggests that the active layer has a maximum thickness that is controlled by the amount of energy lost from the ground to the atmosphere during winter. Vertical permafrost thaw was found to be significantly greater in areas with taliks (0.07 m year-1) than without (0.01 m year-1). Furthermore, the spatial distribution of areas with taliks increased between 2011 and 2015 from 20% to 48%, a phenomenon likely caused by an anomalously large ground heat flux input in 2012. Wide-spread talik development can therefore expedite permafrost thaw and add further complexity to the observed changes to basin hydrology.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,766
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,472

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,239
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)Même sujetClimate change and permafrostTravaux en français237 207