Sequential and Urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Followed by Kidney Transplantation in a Highly Sensitized Patient With Unstable Angina
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We present the case of a 63-year-old man admitted on September 22, 2016, for deceased donor kidney transplantation (KTx). The patient had end-stage renal disease secondary to diabetic nephropathy and was on chronic hemodialysis. His medical history included hypertension, diabetes mellitus type 2, atrial fibrillation, and remote history of hepatitis B and hepatitis C infection without cirrhosis. The patient became highly sensitized from a previous KTx in November 2014, which was complicated by delayed graft function and rejection that culminated in a graft nephrectomy. The patient’s calculated panel-reactive antibody was 100% (class I, 94% and class II, 93%). His pretransplant cardiac workup included a normal cardiac nuclear stress test in August 2013 and a normal transthoracic echocardiogram in January 2015. After 17 months on the waiting list, the patient was offered an expanded criteria donor kidney through the national highly sensitized patient registry run by the Canadian Blood Services. On arrival, the patient complained of a 2-week history of exertional angina. An urgent coronary angiogram demonstrated a distal left main coronary artery lesion of 90% involving the origin of both the left anterior descending and the circumflex coronary artery. The dominant right coronary artery demonstrated minor irregularities, with few lesions between 20% and 30%. There were no other significant lesions. The left ventricular ejection fraction was 40% by ventriculogram, with global hypokinesis. This lesion was deemed not amenable to percutaneous coronary intervention. A multidisciplinary team, composed of nephrologists, cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, transplant surgeons, and anesthesiologists, was convened to discuss the feasibility of performing a coronary artery bypass graft surgery with subsequent KTx transplantation. This decision was especially important given the unlikelihood of finding another well-matched and crossmatch-negative transplant allograft for this highly sensitized patient. The group agreed that KTx would not be performed in the event of complications from the coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. An informed consent was obtained. The patient underwent a 2-vessel on pump CABG surgery (left internal thoracic artery graft to left anterior descending coronary artery and saphenous vein graft to obtuse marginal coronary artery) on September 23rd. Soon after the initiation of CABG surgery, the donor kidney was procured and immediately placed on the LifePort Kidney Transporter for hypothermic machine perfusion. Immediately postoperatively, the patient required norepinephrine 25 μg/min and epinephrine 2 μg/min. Vasopressors were discontinued by 12 hours post-CABG, at which point, the patient underwent an uncomplicated KTx to the left iliac fossa on September 24th (Figure 1). The total cold ischemia time was 18 hours.FIGURE 1: Timeline of clinical events. Day 0 represents the day of hospital admission.The donor kidney was from a 66-year-old male donor who was declared to be brain dead after a cerebrovascular event. The donor was deemed an expanded criteria donor based on age. The Kidney Donor Risk Index was 1.6, and the Kidney Donor Profile Index was 91%. The preprocurement creatinine was 155 μmol/L (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], 46 mL/min). Our patient had only 1 HLA A mismatch with the donor. Immunosuppression consisted of alemtuzumab and maintenance tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, and prednisone. The patient was dialyzed before CABG and did not require dialysis posttransplant. Postoperatively, the patient was started on aspirin 80 mg daily, metoprolol 100 mg twice daily BID, and atorvastatin 20 mg daily. Serum creatinine (Scr) was 723 μmol/L on September 25th and subsequently decreased to 344 μmol/L by September 30th. He was discharged on postoperative day 12 with a Scr of 180 μmol/L. At 2-week postdischarge, patient’s Scr was 160 μmol/L (eGFR, 39 mL/min per 1.73 m2). The patient was readmitted on November 11th with pyelonephritis and acute kidney injury. He also developed borderline T cell–mediated rejection on February 1, 2017, requiring treatment with high-dose corticosteroids. Since then, 1 year posttransplantation, he has not had other complications from his KTx and he has not had any complications from his CABG surgery. One year posttransplantation, the patient remains dialysis free. On September 7, 2017, the patient’s Scr was 266 μmol/L (eGFR, 21 mL/min per 1.73 m2). Preoperative screening and monitoring guidelines for KTx candidates differ from the preoperative recommendations for the general population, in part due to the higher prevalence and incidence of cardiovascular disease in this patient population.1 There is little data on outcomes of KTx immediately after CABG. Kashu et al2 reported a case of a successful simultaneous single CABG and living donor KTx in a patient found to have ischemic electrocardiogram changes upon admission to hospital. Kocher et al3 reported a single case of simultaneous CABG and KTx and 16 cases of KTx within 180 days after CABG. One must be aware of the infectious complications after CABG and KTx (especially high risk of respiratory infections and sternal wound infections), which represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the heart transplant literature.4 Although similar future clinical situations must be approached in a case by case basis, we felt at the time that this course of action would be the patient’s best chance of obtaining a successful KTx. With prompt recognition of symptoms, appropriate planning and teamwork, we show that KTx can be safely and successfully performed immediately after urgent open-heart surgery for coronary artery disease.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».