20 Follow-Up after a Paediatric Emergency Department Visit – Telephone versus Electronic Mail
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Internet has become an unlimited source of health related information and revolutionised health information access by parents. Follow-up after an Emergency Department (ED) visit is important for continuity of care, monitoring changes in patient health and for informing patients of test results taken during their visit. We conducted this study to determine if electronic main (e-mail) would be better than phone for follow-up. During two months, research assistants recruited parents of children being discharged from a large tertiary ED in Toronto, Ontario, that have a personal e-mail account and a personal telephone line. Parents were randomized to e-mail or phone follow-up, that included two questions. Parents not replying to the e-mail were contacted via telephone after 10 days. The main outcome measure was the response rate. Data was collected on Microsoft Excel and statistical analyses used SPSS for calculation of response rate and comparisons between the phone and e-mail groups. A total of 337 families were approached. Two hundred and sixty five (79%) had Internet access, personal e-mail and telephone line available and 75% of them check e-mails at least once a day. A total of 198 families were randomized for a follow-up. Of 98 families, 85 (87%) were reached by phone within average of 17 hours (range 0–98). Of 100 families contacted via e-mail only 53 (53%) responded in a mean of 46 hours (range 0–242) (p<0.0005). Ten (10%) of the e-mails “bounced back”. Of the parents in the e-mail group that had received the e-mail and did not respond 21 (57%) did not check the e-mail, did not remember reading the e-mail or had problems with e-mail access, 1 (3%) did not have time to respond and 15 (40%) were not reached even by phone. E-mail failed to be better than phone in reaching families for follow-up after a Paediatric ED visit. It could be used for non-urgent messages by about half of our patient population that can access the Internet.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».