Estimated Late Health Outcomes in Children Newly Diagnosed with Mature B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated with Contemporary LMB Chemotherapy Based upon Similarly Treated Participants in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Since the mid-1990's, overall survival rates for children diagnosed with mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) have exceeded 90%, due in large part to the widespread utilization of the LMB chemotherapy regimen. As a result, a population of survivors living beyond 5 years from diagnosis and treatment with this regimen is emerging, providing the first opportunity to study late-occurring and chronic health outcomes following contemporary B-NHL therapy. Methods: Late health outcomes and health status were self-reported among CCSS participants who were 5-year survivors of childhood B-NHL and whose treatment exposures were consistent with LMB-defined risk-groups (A - low; B - intermediate; and C - high risk). Combinations of individual chemotherapy agents (cyclophosphamide [CPM], vincristine, prednisone, doxorubicin [doxo], high-dose methotrexate [HD-MTX], cytarabine, and etoposide) and respective cumulative doses (for CPM, doxo, HD-MTX, and etoposide) were abstracted from medical records. Chronic health conditions occurring ≥5 years from cancer diagnosis were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03). Decreased fertility was defined as failure to achieve or sire a pregnancy after ≥1 year of trying among survivors of childbearing age (15-44 years). Health status outcomes were obtained from validated questionnaires. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were estimated. Cox and logistic regression models (adjusted for age, sex, and race) provided hazard (HR) and odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of health conditions and status compared to a sibling comparison group (n=4,023). Results: We identified 94 B-NHL survivors (median age 10 [range 2-20] years at diagnosis, 24 [10-39] years at evaluation, 14 [7-26] years post diagnosis), for which pertinent LMB treatment exposures are included in Table 1. Compared to siblings, survivors were more likely to be male (79% vs. 48%, p<0.001), younger at evaluation (24.3 ± 6.1 vs. 26.7 ± 9.2 years, p<0.001), and non-white race (22% vs 13%, p=0.006). Thirty-five (37%) survivors had ≥1 chronic condition (grades 1-5); a 4-fold increased risk (HR 4.1, 95% CI: 2.9-5.8) compared to siblings (Group A HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.2-5.6, Group B HR 5.2, 95% CI 3.1-8.6, and Group C HR 4.2, 95% CI 2.4-7.6). The most frequently occurring conditions were obesity (24%) and decreased fertility (10%). Excluding these, Group B (HR 5.3, 95% CI 1.6-17.3) and Group C (HR 5.7, 95% CI 1.7-19.0) survivors remained at increased risk of having ≥1 chronic condition. Group A survivors showed a similar HR without statistical significance (HR 4.0, 95% CI 0.5-31.3). Three survivors died during study follow-up (SMR 6.5, 95% CI 1.3-19.0), only one died due to a non-cancer related cause of death. All Groups (A-C) were more likely than siblings to report impaired functional status (OR 11.2, 95% CI 3.5-35.6; 4.5, 95% CI 1.5-13.1; and 15.1, 95% CI 6.0-37.8, respectively). Groups B and C survivors were more likely to report poor mental health (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.0-8.6 and 3.7, 95% CI 1.0-12.9, respectively), while Group B survivors were more likely to report poor general health (OR 5.1, 95% CI 2.2-11.9). No associations with activity limitations (p's>0.1) or sociodemographic differences (educational level less than a college degree, p's>0.1; household income less than $60,000/year, p's>0.1) were identified in any Groups. Cancer-related pain and anxiety did not differ in Groups B or C compared to survivors in Group A (p=0.9 and 0.2, respectively). Conclusions: Despite excellent survival rates, children diagnosed with B-NHL and treated with contemporary LMB chemotherapy regimens are at risk for chronic health conditions and health status limitations by 14 years from diagnosis. Studies exploring the trajectory of these findings and the impact of early interventions are needed to inform future frontline treatment protocols. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».