Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The GB at ESICON 2016 entrusted me to take on the reins of the Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. And I am deeply thankful. THE PAST IJEM has come a long way since its humble beginnings. The current Editorial Board is fortunate to have inherited the Journal in reasonable health and salutes the efforts of the previous Editorial teams; it also acknowledges the hand-holding by the outgoing Executive Editor Dr AG Unnikrishnan for almost 8 months. THE PRESENT There are several reasons for the members of Endocrine Society of India to be happy about their journal: Predictable bimonthly publication in both print and online versions The journal is indexed with, or included in, the following: DOAJ, Index Copernicus, Indian Science Abstracts, IndMed, PubMed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOPUS Obviously our primary focus is to highlight and showcase endocrine research in India; but we can be proud that 17% of manuscript submissions for 2017 have come from outside India A moderate rejection rate of around 45% over the years A steady increase in visibility, as evidenced by the increase in citations, especially over the last 2 years. Also, analysis of visitors to the journal website shows significant interest from the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, China, Brazil, Indonesia, South Korea and Egypt. THE FUTURE A crucial part in peer-reviewed journals is played by its Reviewers. I am honestly thankful to all those who respond on time; from personal experience I can well appreciate when some of you are unable to keep to our rather tight timelines. I hope to see a drop in the current non-response rate of Reviewers from around 30%, which would translate into shorter turn-around time for an article. We are working on the possibility of increasing the frequency of publication, so that you get it every month. A felt-need is to set ourselves up for getting an Impact Factor for IJEM. We hope to add flavor to the journal by adding regular sections like ‘Visual Vignette’ and ‘Lessons Learnt’. Additionally we hope to revamp the International Advisory Board. We also need to streamline the process within our system, with greater involvement of the Associate Editors. We are extremely proud of the growing pool of wise and talented Endocrinologists in our country. I appeal to all members, especially the younger generation, to provide inputs for improvements of IJEM; you can do so personally at ESICON 2017 or by emailing me ([email protected]) or, the Executive Editor Dr Sujoy Ghosh ([email protected]). Above all, please do consider IJEM your preferred destination to publish anything related to Endocrinology, whether clinical or, basic science-related. Long live Endocrine Society of India and a robust future for IJEM! “The past may dictate who we are, but we get to determine what we become” — Unknown
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».