MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2762267137 · doi:10.1111/jpc.13625

Australian guide to the diagnosis of foetal alcohol spectrum disorder: A summary

2017· article· en· W2762267137 sur OpenAlex
Carol Bower, Elizabeth Elliott, Marcel Zimmet, Juanita Doorey, Amanda Wilkins, Vicki Russell, Doug Shelton, James Fitzpatrick, Rochelle Watkins

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFetal Alcohol Spectrum DisorderMedicineGuidelinePediatricsPsychiatryPathologyPregnancy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Foetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder caused by prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE). In some individuals, characteristic facial features result from the teratogenic effect of first trimester PAE. In response to limited training opportunities in FASD, lack of a nationally adopted diagnostic instrument and confusion about diagnostic criteria, The Australian Guide to the Diagnosis of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder has been developed, funded by the Commonwealth Department of Health (DoH). Building on a literature review of diagnostic criteria and guidelines from Canada and the USA,1-4 Delphi surveys5-9 and a consensus workshop using the GRADE approach,10, 11 an Australian diagnostic instrument was developed in 2012. In 2015–2016, with additional funding from the DoH, a feasibility trial was conducted, and the instrument, guide and e-learning modules were finalised and harmonised with the new Canadian guideline for diagnosis of FASD.12 The Australian Guide to the Diagnosis of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder and e-learning modules were released in mid-2016 and are freely available at http://alcoholpregnancy.telethonkids.org.au/australian-fasd-diagnostic-instrument/australian-guide-to-the-diagnosis-of-fasd/. This includes clinical forms that can be used during evaluation. A key recommendation in the guide is the adoption of FASD as a diagnostic term, with two subcategories: FASD with three sentinel facial features and FASD with less than three sentinel facial features. Diagnostic criteria relate to PAE, severe neurodevelopmental impairment in 3 out of 10 domains and sentinel facial features (small palpebral fissures, smooth philtrum and thin upper lip) (Table 1; Fig. 1). FASD with three sentinel facial features replaces the diagnosis of foetal alcohol syndrome, but without a requirement for growth impairment.11 FASD with less than three sentinel facial features encompasses the previous categories of partial foetal alcohol syndrome and neurodevelopmental disorder-alcohol exposed.11 Co-existing or alternative diagnoses including genetic conditions (e.g. microdeletions or duplications), effects of other teratogens and prenatal exposures, as well as the effects of postnatal exposures such as early life trauma and brain injury should be considered. Neurodevelopmental domains Sentinel facial features The diagnosis of FASD requires multidisciplinary assessment including comprehensive physical and developmental assessment, as well as psychometric testing, preferably by a multidisciplinary diagnostic team, and typically led by a medical specialist such as a paediatrician, psychiatrist or geneticist. The assessment process may be confronting for the individual or caregiver who should provide informed consent beforehand, and receive appropriate support as required. This is particularly salient when biological parents or family are involved. An assessment report outlining the individual's strengths and difficulties, and recommendations should be provided to the family and referring clinician or agency. The value of sharing this information with relevant service providers (including teachers) should be discussed. If FASD is diagnosed, written information about the condition and contact details for the National Organisation for FASD (http://www.nofasd.org/) should be provided. Dissemination of the guide and the e-learning modules aims to standardise FASD diagnosis. We hope that it will provide clinicians with increased confidence to consider a diagnosis of FASD, the knowledge to refer for or make the diagnosis, and the information needed to manage and support individuals and families living with FASD. The guide will be updated as new evidence emerges, to ensure it reflects current knowledge and best practice in the evolving field of FASD. Having national, standardised criteria for diagnosis will also improve our ability to advocate for services, monitor FASD prevalence, and support efforts to reduce PAE and hence enable primary prevention of FASD. The trial and implementation phase of the diagnostic instrument for foetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) in Australia was funded through a contract from the Commonwealth Department of Health and benefited from the contribution of time, intellectual input and commitment by members of the Expert Review Panel (Professor EJ Elliott (Chair), Professor C Bower, Dr J Fitzpatrick, Ms V Russell, Dr D Shelton, Dr A Wilkins and Dr M Zimmet) and the Steering Group (Professor C Bower (Chair), Mr Scott Avery, Dr Felicity Collins, Dr Jennifer Delima, Professor EJ Elliott, Dr J Fitzpatrick, Ms Andrea Lammel, Ms V Russell, Dr D Shelton, Dr Lydia So, Dr David Thomas, Dr A Wilkins and Dr M Zimmet). We thank members of the Telethon Kids Institute's Alcohol, Pregnancy and FASD Research Program (Roslyn Giglia, Noni Walker, Heather Jones and Eliza Offereins). We are grateful to Dr Jocelynn Cooke and colleagues, who provided valuable advice and further detail on the Canadian Guidelines. The online modules were developed by Dr M Zimmet, Professor EJ Elliott, J Doorey and Professor C Bower. We acknowledge the technical expertise of Dr Rob Phillips, Dave Wheeler, Rob Bull and Pete Phillips in the development of the modules, and Melanie Hogan, Reverb Pty Ltd for use of her DVD 'The Story of Alcohol Use in Pregnancy and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders'. We also thank the clinicians, parents and carers who participated in the trial. EJ Elliott is supported by an NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (no. 1021480).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,186
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,318

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,320
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle