136: Fragile X Syndrome in Canada: A Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common form of inherited intellectual and developmental disability. FXS is characterized by a behavioural phenotype which may include symptoms of autism and attention deficit-hyperactivity, in addition to mild physical features. The prevalence of FXS has been estimated at 1 in 4000 males and 1 in 5–8000 females. There is limited information in the medical literature on the demographics of fragile X syndrome in Canada. It is currently unclear whether the prevalence is similar to published rates in other populations, whether there is a delay in obtaining a diagnosis, and whether there are significant numbers of individuals with FXS, but without access to specialty care. To ascertain the incidence of new diagnoses of FXS as well as obtain information about the demographics, clinical features, geographic distribution and management of FXS in Canada. Paediatricians and paediatric subspecialists who participate in the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program (CPSP) were asked to identify newly diagnosed cases of fragile X syndrome seen between April 2012 and April 2014. When new cases were identified, the reporting physician was asked to complete a detailed questionnaire to obtain clinical data on the case. Quantitative and qualitative analyses will be performed to assess incidence, demographics including age at diagnosis, sex, ethnicity, geographic location, clinical features, and access to care for reported cases; with comparisons to previously published data. 41 cases were reported during the study period and a total of 28 cases with completed questionnaires were included for data analysis. There were two females and 26 males. Cases were reported from many provinces across the country with the highest number of cases (n=12, 43%) reported in Ontario. The vast majority of cases were of Caucasian ethnicity. The majority of reporting physicians were responsible for ordering the diagnostic testing. The majority of cases were diagnosed after the age of three years. Additional patient demographic data, clinical features and services used will be analyzed and presented. New diagnoses of Fragile X syndrome are being made in Canada at a rate in keeping with expected prevalence. The geographic distribution and patient demographics were generally representative of the Canadian population. However there was evidence of delayed diagnoses based on generally early ages of parents reported first concern and late ages at diagnosis. Paradoxically the diagnostic laboratories across the country continue to perform enormous numbers of normal fragile X tests every year, raising the concern that the wrong children are being tested. Delayed diagnoses have been a consistent problem in the United States and the concern has led to a call for population-based screening. The CPSP study has shown that the experience of Canadian families affected by fragile X-related disorders is in many ways similar to American families, and that an improved approach to recognizing and diagnosing FXS would be of benefit.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».