115: Don & Elizabeth Hillman International Child Health Grant Awardees: Where are they Now?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 2003, the Don & Elizabeth Hillman International Child Health Grant was created by the Canadian Pediatric Society (CPS) Global Child & Youth Health Section to promote international health opportunities for residents and fellows. Forty awards were administered ($750 – $1000) from 2003 to 2013, for use towards costs of paediatrics elective in low-middle income countries (LMIC). It is one of the few funding opportunities of its kind available to Canadian paediatric trainees. It is timely to evaluate the impact of providing supportive funds for such experiences and their effects on recipient career paths. This evaluation aimed to describe interest, enablers, and perceived barriers of career activities in global health amongst those who completed a funded international elective during residency, and to examine how these experiences may influence the time dedicated to global health activities including local patient populations. Past Hillman Grant recipients were contacted by email to complete an online survey, which was designed from review of relevant literature, to assess interest, perceived enablers and barriers in global health experiences and career paths. Data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at University of British Columbia. Nineteen out of 40 grant awardees completed the online survey; five are still in residency or fellowship. While for 8/19, receiving the grant influenced their decision to go, the remainder would have done an international residency elective (IRE) regardless but qualitative review indicates that it assisted in lifting ‘burden of cost’ and was appreciated, but not sole influential factor in participating. Nearly half (47%) have pursued further training related to global health (GH), while another 36% are planning to do so in the future. The majority (79%) endorsed that participation in an IRE encouraged future global health involvement, while all respondents felt the experience influenced their attitudes towards health care. Ten (of 14 total) pediatrician respondents indicated that they currently spend time in GH activities (both locally and abroad); respondents are involved with caring for families receiving social assistance (14/19), newcomer health (11/19), First Nations/Inuit/Metis health (10/19), GH education within Canada (14/19), and health education outside Canada (10/19). Enablers to participation in GH activities include: family support (11/19), departmental support (10/19), international electives (9/19) and mentorship (8/19). Most significant barriers to participation in GH activities were: scheduling (16/19) with 68% of these indicating need to use vacation time, financial (15/19), and family obligations (10/19). Recipients of the Hillman grants generally are involved with the care of vulnerable children within and outside Canada, and for many, their international elective experience influenced those career directions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,114 | 0,019 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».