MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2763070478 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.16.01300

What’s Important: Integrating Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education in Orthopaedics

2017· article· en· W2763070478 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter V. Scoles, Shepard R. Hurwitz

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInnovations in Medical Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAccreditationCurriculumGraduate medical educationMedical educationReimbursementStandardizationMedical schoolMedicineHealth carePsychologyPolitical sciencePedagogy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

One hundred years ago, most medical school graduates entered practice immediately; structured postgraduate training was uncommon. Today, nearly all of the medical school graduates in the U.S. complete residencies accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), and many pursue 1 or more years of fellowship training. Certainly, there is more to learn today, but it is also clear that “learning to learn” (continuous inquiry, self-assessment, and incorporation of new information and skills) is equally important. The education of a physician is expensive. The cumulative expense of tuition, fees, and living expenses for undergraduate college and medical schools often exceeds $600,000. Amortized over 20 years, the total cost easily can exceed $1,000,000. The cost to academic health centers also is substantial. The institutional direct and indirect costs of medical education are growing at a time when reimbursement for graduate medical education is decreasing. Efforts to improve efficiency and reduce cost are essential1. Integration of the medical school curriculum and the first year of postgraduate training is a practical approach. Although the educational methodology of the first 3 years varies in U.S. medical schools, curriculum content is relatively uniform, in large part because of the norming effect of Steps 1 and 2 of the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination. There is, however, little standardization in the curriculum content, learning objectives, or assessment methods for year 4. Individual student experience is variable, learning often is fragmented, and assessments are unreliable. Program directors have very little idea about the competencies of incoming residents, and, consequently, much of the first year of postgraduate training is spent bringing new residents to common levels. Medical schools, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), specialty boards including the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS), and the ACGME have made substantial progress in setting respective expectations. Not surprisingly, there is substantial overlap with the expected competencies in the fundamental skills of history-taking, physical examination, differential diagnosis, and interprofessional communication. If undergraduate medical educators and postgraduate program directors collaborate in curriculum design and delivery, seamless integration of undergraduate and graduate medical education is possible. Changing the Paradigm The Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME), the accrediting body for U.S. medical schools, requires 130 weeks (3 years) of instruction for the award of the MD degree. Most U.S. medical schools have a 4-year curriculum, a legacy of the 1910 Flexner Report. There are no impediments to shortening the undergraduate phase of medical education as long as the curriculum exceeds the 130-week threshold and meets general LCME guidelines for curriculum content, delivery, assessment, and student well-being. All state, U.S. commonwealth, and U.S. territorial medical boards accept the LCME 130-week guideline as the basis for licensure. The ABOS requires 60 months of postgraduate training for Board eligibility2. Modifications to the length of training require a waiver from the ABOS and approval by the Residency Review Committee (RRC). The ACGME has recently published additional requirements for substantial changes in program duration, educational methodology, and assessment of competency3. Proposals that seek to integrate undergraduate and graduate education must comply with the ACGME’s Advancing Innovation in Residency Education (AIRE) directives. Models for Change A small number of U.S. medical schools offer 3-year MD-degree tracks, either as stand-alone curricula or as a parallel track4. Graduates of 3-year schools meet all of the existing requirements for entry into postgraduate training. A few U.S. medical schools include a year of research in the 4-year curriculum. In these schools, rearrangement of the undergraduate schedule to permit delivery of the 130-week core requirement permits early award of the MD degree. The 3-year programs reduce redundancy and reduce the cost of medical education, but may limit student opportunities5. Many students use the latter half of year 3 and the first half of year 4 to refine specialty choices and participate in elective rotations that enhance residency applications. Graduates of the 3-year programs must choose much earlier, and they have more limited elective opportunities. Because their portfolios contain less information, they may be at a disadvantage when applying for highly competitive residency positions outside of their parent institutions. Competency-based advancement within residency is another approach to reducing redundancy and improving efficiency6. The Canadian experience in competency-based orthopaedic education suggests that some trainees will finish early, most others will finish in the traditionally allotted time frame, and a few may require additional time7. In such a system, subspecialty training could begin during residency. A competency-based advancement system that spans the entire duration of training is theoretically possible, but poses great challenges in a large multi-setting residency program. In orthopaedics (and perhaps in other specialties), a hybrid that blends year 4 with postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) provides a controlled learning experience and offers the opportunity for competency-based acceleration. The flexibility of year 4 permits the development of a musculoskeletal “track” that satisfies all PGY-1 requirements. If the assessment instruments used in residency are used for students as well, competency-based advancement from medical school to residency is feasible. Mid-fourth-year graduation for students who meet milestones saves a half year of tuition, and permits the opportunity for 6 months of PGY-1-level patient-care responsibility prior to entering PGY-2. Students who complete such a program but do not choose or are not selected for accelerated entry will be excellent candidates for traditional residency programs. Conclusions Integrating the graduation competencies defined by the AAMC with the milestones defined by the ABOS and the ACGME eliminates redundancy and sets uniform expectations for students considering a career in orthopaedics. When combined with competency-based advancement systems, this integration offers the additional opportunity to accelerate training for qualified candidates, reduces costs for learners and the institutions where they train, and ensures adequate training opportunities for all.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,024
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,065
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,127

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0240,065
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,004
Communication savante0,0100,017
Science ouverte0,0030,012
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,009
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,344
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery→Même sujetInnovations in Medical Education→Travaux en français237 207→