EMOTIONAL SUPPORT FOR SIBLINGS OF CHILDREN WITH CHRONIC ILLNESS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Siblings of sick children are not often the focus of the family’s attention. Families with a sick child are commonly stressed by time, emotions and finances. Sibling mental health can be difficult for parents to appreciate (Roche et al., 2016) and many studies reveal the developmental importance of sibling relationships (Feinberg et al., 2012). An annual event was created at our tertiary care pediatric centre to celebrate and support siblings of patients with chronic complex medical issues. The primary purpose of this event was to raise awareness for sibling support and to connect families with possible community supports. OBJECTIVES: This study had two primary objectives. First, we studied if parents of complex pediatric patients recognize emotional stress on their other children. Secondly, we inquired if these parents are accessing psychological support resources for these siblings. DESIGN/METHODS: The third annual sibling celebration events was held by the pediatric resident advocacy group at our tertiary care pediatric centre. Awareness of the event was created by posters distributed in the hospital and in the community. Over 20 families and 100 people total attended this event. Caregivers who attended the sibling celebration event were given the opportunity to complete a survey addressing the emotional health of siblings. The survey also collected demographics, and invited comments about the event for quality assurance. RESULTS: Parental surveys were administered and 20 responses were collected. All parents surveyed reported a perceived impact of chronic illness on the well sibling(s). Most caregivers reported impact was moderate or significant (85%). The majority of primary caregivers (67%) were concerned about the emotional health of the siblings. The majority (90%) of all caregivers reported not accessing resources for emotional support of the siblings. There were also comments regarding stressors and factors contributing to why sibling emotional supports were not being accessed. CONCLUSION: Parents of children with chronic illness perceive that emotional stress is an significant issue for their healthy children. Despite this being a recognized need and worry, the majority of these parents are not accessing psychological supports for the siblings. Reasons for not accessing resources are multi-factorial, and should be explored further in future studies. Preliminary results suggest lack of time, limited available resources in the community and financial stresses are predominant challenges. Exploring this topic further is important for possible implementation of psychological services for families and siblings of chronically ill children in the future as a part of offered hospital services.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».