176: Access to Primary Care for Children with and without Asthma in Montreal: A Randomized Telephone Audit Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Primary health care is an essential component of the health care system and has been shown to improve health outcomes (such as decreased urgent health care use) in patients with chronic conditions. Asthma is the most prevalent chronic illness in children and contributes major costs to the system with emergency room visits and hospital admissions. The federal and provincial governments had recognized the value of primary care and over a decade ago had invested millions of dollars in primary care reforms to improve quality and access for the population. Reforms introduced new models of care, such as Family Medicine Groups (FMG) and Integrated Network clinics in Quebec, as well as financial incentives for physicians to take on patients with chronic conditions but there is no evidence that these structures or incentives have been successful in prioritizing children with conditions such as asthma. Very little data exist on access to primary health care for children in Canada. It is thus pertinent to explore whether children with asthma are being prioritized in terms of access to primary care. To determine the patient acceptance rates into primary care practices in Montreal for a child without asthma compared to a healthy child. We conducted a randomized telephone audit study between July 24–October 10, 2014 in which primary care clinics in Montreal were randomized to two script scenarios. One scenario consisted of a caller posing as a mother of a four-year-old son with asthma, and the second was a mother of a healthy four-year-old son. In both cases, the caller was looking for a primary care physician for the child. We collected baseline data on the clinics, including health and social services region, clinic type (pediatrics, FMG, FMG-integrated network, non-FMG clinics). We conducted descriptive statistics (proportions) and χ2 tests to determine difference between the acceptance rates of two scenarios. Of the 257 clinics included, 30 (11.7%) were willing to accept a child. There was no significant difference between acceptance rates for a child with or without asthma (13.3% vs. 10.2%, respectively). Of the 227 clinics that would not accept the child, 45 (18.5%) said they did not accept children at all. Pediatric compared to other clinic types were more likely to accept new patients (P=0.005). Access to primary care in Montreal is poor. The majority (88.3%) of primary care clinics are not accepting children altogether. Children with asthma are not being prioritized in terms of access to primary care. Given the importance of primary care in children, especially those with chronic disease, policy-makers should re-examine current structures and incentives to address problems in primary care access.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».