54: Prescribing Happiness: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Psychosocial interventions often aim to alleviate negative emotional states. There is a growing interest in cultivating positive emotional states and qualities. Few studies have been done in a pediatric population, but results were inconclusive. We now know that the relation that children have with others, especially with their families, makes them happy. To test the effect of a family-centered positive psychology intervention on subjective well-being of children. A randomized controlled trial of a community sample of children and their family. Participants were assigned to a one-week family-centered positive psychology intervention (PPI), a control literacy intervention (CPS Read, speak, sing program) or a wait list control. The PPI consisted of a ‘Gratitude visit’ (children were given one week to write and then deliver a letter of gratitude in person to someone who had been especially kind to them but had never been properly thanked) and ‘Three good things in life’ (participants were asked to write down three things that went well each day and their causes every night for one week. In addition they were asked to provide a causal explanation for each good thing and discuss it with their family). Participants completed self-reported inventories that measured happiness (Subjective Happiness Scale [SHL] and Student's Life Satisfaction Scale [SLSS]) and gratitude (Gratitude Adjectives Checklist(GAC)) pre-intervention, post-intervention and one month. A total of 24 children (14 girls [52%]; mean (± SD) age 10±2 years) and their family were randomly assigned to PPI (n=7), literacy intervention (n=10) or wait list control (n=7). Well-being increased significantly for the PPI group at post- and follow-up assessment on the SHL and the SLSS compared to the control or wait list group. Parents happiness (SHL) and life satisfaction increased significantly in the the PPI compared to the literacy or wait list group. No significant changes were detected on the GAC but the PPI group showed more positive emotions (optimism and enthousiasm). The perception that parents had of their child's happiness was increased in the PPI and the literacy groups at post-assessment, and at the one-month follow-up in the PPI group. A family-centered intervention based on promoting positive emotions and well-being was effective not only in increasing psychological well-being of children but also their parents. These findings may have important implications for mental health and well-being.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,031 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».