Review: Global Ordering: Institutions and Autonomy in a Changing World - eScholarship
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Review: Global Ordering: Institutions and Autonomy in a Changing World Louis W. Pauly and William D.Coleman (Eds.) Reviewed by Elery Hamilton-Smith Charles Sturt University, Australia Pauly, Louis W. and Coleman, William D. (Eds.). Global Ordering: Institutions and Autonomy in a Changing World. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press, 2008. 352pp. ISBN 9780774814348. US$37.95, paper. This is only one of a remarkable sequence of books and other publications which appear from the Canadian Major Collaborative Research Initiative on Globalization and Autonomy. Those involved also maintain a remarkable collective publication in the Globalization and Autonomy Online Compendium (http://www.globalautonomy.ca). This provides a dynamic overview of the total initiative and at the same time serves an integrative role for scholars both inside and outside of the Initiative. This volume comprises a series of studies each reviewing the impacts of globalization from a significant perspective. The authors set out to be truly multi-disciplinary but have developed a remarkably holistic perspective which might even be described as “beyond disciplinarity.” Of course, the very idea of holism has a long history of rejection, even though long sequences of scholars have struggled to think holistically in order to understand whole systems. In coining the very word holism, Smuts argued that wholes are reality, while the parts are abstract analytical tools used by scholars. In itself, the processes of globalization together constitute a whole, and the Canadian team demonstrates considerable intellectual courage in developing holistic understandings. This volume ranges over and describes relationships across the United Nations, international law, agriculture, whaling, World Heritage, trade, governance, religion, social policies, sovereignty, subsidiarity and polar politics. Certainly, their global thinking can only be strategically understood as a whole based in reality. The cover description states simply that the book “explores key institutional fault lines between the tectonic plates of globalization and the insistent demands for individual and collective autonomy. Despite myriad global forces influencing the lives of individuals, societies and polities, people continue to value their personal and communal independence. . . At the same time, many formal and informal institutions . . . are evolving, adapting to meet new challenges, or failing to adjust rapidly enough.” The result is a fascinating and dynamic story of the exploratory process. Most of the authors capture truly complex processes in clear, competent, professional writing. It is nevertheless not simplified or dumbed down, but helps the reader to understand the reality underlying the exploratory journeys. I often judge a book by assessing how well it deals with the specific topic in which I have most experience and understanding, so I gave my closest attention to the chapter on the World Heritage Convention. That chapter is an unparalleled picture of the challenges and responses underlying the more than 50 years of evolution of the World Heritage Movement. I conclude with a sincere respect for the achievements of the Initiative, hence congratulations to the responsible scholars and the strongest recommendation that any persons seeking to understand globalization and its myriad inter-relations should purchase this very fine book. Elery Hamilton-Smith , Professor, Charles Sturt University, Australia, P.O. Box 36, Carlton South, Victoria 3053, Australia. TEL: 613-9489-77850. Electronic Green Journal, Issue 29, Winter 2009, ISSN:1076-7975
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».