Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Workshop on Deep Learning and the Brain Andrew Michael Saxe (asaxe@stanford.edu) Center for Mind, Brain, and Computation, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University 316 Jordan Hall, Stanford, CA 94305 USA Keywords: Deep learning; Neural networks; Sensory process- ing ences, makes this workshop both timely and important for the cognitive science community. Introduction Goals and scope Deep learning methods rely on many layers of processing to perform sensory processing tasks like visual object recog- nition, speech recognition, and natural language processing (Bengio & LeCun, 2007). By learning simpler features in lower layers, and composing these into more complex fea- tures in higher layers, deep learning systems take advantage of the compositional nature of many real world tasks. To recognize cars, for instance, a deep system might first build wheel detectors, window detectors, etc, in lower layers, be- fore combining these into a car detector at a higher layer. Deep learning has emerged as a central tool in the engineer- ing disciplines due to its impressive performance in a range of applications, from visual object classification (Krizhevsky, Sutskever, & Hinton, 2012; Ciresan, Meier, & Schmidhu- ber, 2012) to speech recognition (Mohamed, Dahl, & Hinton, 2012) and natural language processing (Collobert & Weston, Parts of the brain (and in particular the visual system) ap- pear to share some of these features. Anatomically, they con- sist of a series of processing layers than can be arranged hi- erarchically (Felleman & Van Essen, 1991). And function- ally, neural responses show a progression of complexity from lower to higher levels (Quiroga, Reddy, Kreiman, Koch, & Fried, 2005), and these representations change with experi- ence. In light of these similarities, this workshop will explore the implications of deep learning for our understanding of the brain and mind. To what degree can the brain be con- sidered “deep”? How central is depth to its function? What insights from machine learning can inform work in cognitive science, and visa versa? How does depth impact both the dy- namics of learning in a neural network, and the content of what is learned? How might deep learning models illuminate phenomena of interest to cognitive scientists such as percep- tual learning, language acquisition, cognitive development, and category formation? The participants in this workshop have been chosen to present a broad range of perspectives on deep learning in the cognitive sciences. They span computational and empirical approaches, and allow for critical contact with other theoret- ical perspectives. The recent rapid progress on deep learn- ing within the machine learning community, and the growing number of deep learning-based models in the cognitive sci- The goal of the workshop is to explore the relevance of re- cent deep learning advances to cognition, to bring together cognitive science-oriented deep learning researchers, and to facilitate exchanges between the machine learning and cog- nitive science communities. While deep learning has been a persistent thread of re- search in the cognitive sciences from the very beginning, a goal of the workshop is to provide a focal point for this com- munity and a forum for important discussions and collabora- tions that can span methodological approaches. Because of the domain general nature of deep learning methods, these approaches can serve to unite a diverse set of researchers fo- cusing on a variety of phenomena. In addition, the workshop will demonstrate the ability of deep learning models to address phenomena at a variety of different scales and levels of detail, with talks covering ma- terial from receptive field models in retina and early visual cortices, through mid-level vision and object recognition, to semantic cognition. Workshop organization The main feature of the workshop will be a series of invited talks meant to span a broad range of perspectives on deep learning and the brain, and concentrated mostly on visual processing. Visual object recognition is the area most stud- ied in prior deep learning work both in machine learning and cognitive science, and hence makes a natural first focus for a workshop. Although the talks will address recent research, by their diverse perspectives they will also constitute a good introduction to the field for those who have not engaged with deep learning before. The workshop is planned as a full day workshop, and each speaker will have approximately 30 min- utes, to leave time for questions and discussion following the talks. Depending on time considerations, the workshop will close with a panel discussion to allow the audience further in- teraction with the speakers, and to permit speakers from dif- ferent backgrounds to engage each other on themes that have emerged during the day. The workshop will also accept submissions of abstracts for posters to be presented during lunch and coffee breaks. Ac- cepted poster submissions will be made available from the workshop website. The aim of the poster sessions is to show- case the much broader range of issues relevant to cognitive
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,024 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».