MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2766165444

Embracing Diversity, Creating Equality: Supporting the Speech, Language and Communication of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Children

2015· article· en· W2766165444 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Verdon

Notice bibliographique

RevueCharles Sturt University Research Output (CRO) · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducation Systems and Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLinguistic diversityDiversity (politics)LinguisticsCultural diversitySociologyPsychologyCommunicationComputer scienceAnthropology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Effective communication is essential for social engagement, educational attainment, and workforce participation. Australia, like many other English-dominant nations is becoming increasingly culturally and linguistically diverse. Therefore an understanding of this diversity is essential for planning services to support all Australian children to become competent and effective communicators in ways that are responsive to their cultural and linguistic background. Yet, little is known about Australian children''s linguistic diversity and how their multilingual speech, language, and communication development can be supported. This doctoral thesis describes the findings of a mixed methods study conducted in two parts and presented as a series of nine publications drawn together through an exegesis. Part 1 (Papers 1 - 4) examines cultural and linguistic diversity and language maintenance among Australian children, as well as the speech-language pathology services available to support them. Drawing on longitudinal quantitative data from the 5,107 children included in the nationally representative Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) and 580 children from the Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children (LSIC), the findings of Part 1 indicated that approximately 15.3% of Australian children did not speak English at the age of formal school commencement, in a context where English is the language of instruction in schools. Additionally, 19.3% of Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children spoke an Indigenous language and 43.1% were reported to speak Aboriginal Australian English. Factors associated with home language maintenance among young Australian multilingual children included parental use of the language at home, the number of generations since migration, type of childcare, and the level of support and understanding from teachers and educational environments. Using geographical mapping analysis, a mismatch was identified between the languages spoken by a subset of 4,386 Australian children from LSAC, and the languages and locations in which support for children's speech, language, and communication were offered by 2,849 Australian speech-language pathology services.Part 2 (Papers 5 - 9) of this research identifies ways that speech-language pathologists (SLPs) can support culturally and linguistically diverse children's speech, language, and communication development throughout the world. First, aspirations and recommendations for supporting children's speech, language, and communication needs were identified by drawing upon international expert opinion. Second, the actualisation (or otherwise) of these aspirations and recommendations in the reality of international practice was examined through the Embracing Diversity - Creating Equality Study. This study involved ethnographic observation of professional practice in 14 international sites in Brazil, Canada, Hong Kong, Italy, and the US, that were identified as working with culturally and linguistically diverse populations. The data from Part 2 were analysed using Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT, Engeström, 1987), a heuristic framework that made visible the reality and complexities of professional practice. From these analyses six overarching principles for guiding practice with culturally and linguistically diverse children were identified: (1) identification of culturally appropriate and mutually motivating therapy goals, (2) knowledge of languages and culture, (3) use of culturally appropriate resources, (4) consideration of the cultural, social and political context, (5) consultation with families and communities, and (6) collaboration with other professionals. The findings identify opportunities for professionals to enhance the cultural competence of their own practice and to become advocates for change to practice with culturally and linguistically diverse children.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,058

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0120,009
Communication savante0,0100,011
Science ouverte0,0010,015
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,147
Tête enseignante GPT0,419
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCharles Sturt University Research Output (CRO)Même sujetEducation Systems and PolicyTravaux en français237 207