MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2766197111 · doi:10.5334/ijic.3601

Carer Needs Assessment Development - A Republic of Ireland led International Joint Working Project to Support Delivery of Integrated Health and Social Care

2017· article· en· W2766197111 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Liam O’Sullivan, Linda Mcdermott Scales, Clare Duffy, Natalie Vereker, Kris Dhondt

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal of Integrated Care · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIntegrated careHealth careNursingMedicinePublic relationsPsychologyEconomic growthPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Despite an increasing share of societal income being used to deliver health and social care services, families accross the globe continue to provide upwards of 80% of the overall care delivered (Huber & Hennessy, 2005; Dieleman et al, 2016). Such carers often experience inadequate recognition of their unique and crucial role in keeping their care recipients well and at home, and in the wider scheme of sustaining national and international healthcare infrastructure. While family carers availability and willingness to provide care is crucial; stress, isolation and ill health are frequently experienced;all of which may impact on their quality of life and ability to care, and further may impact on the availability of this under resourced pool of caregivers into the future.Identifying the needs of family carers is increasingly being viewed as a key intervention in the development of fully integrated health and social care (Guberman et al, 2007). The positive impact of such assessments to carers is wide and varied, particularly in reducing their burden of stress and depressive symptoms (Guberman et al, 2003; Becker et al, 2005; Kwak et al, 2011). Internationally, Carer Needs Assessments (CNA's) have been enshrined in law in the UK for over 20 years and are significantly embedded in assessment processes; while in the US in particular- there has been some legislative initiatives to bring Family Carers closer to the centre of care. This paper discuses the Carer Needs Assessment Development Project and presents preliminary findings on Irish data from the Carer Needs Assesment international pilot study.In giving expression to the Irish National Carers Strategy which seeks to work with Family Carers as partners in care (Department of Health (IRL), 2012), the HSE Single Asessment Tool (SAT) Project established a collaborative Working Group to develop a Carer Needs Assessment for national and international use. This group comprised of HSE SAT national team members, not-for profit national Carer/Advocacy Organisations (NGOs),and the international not-for-profit organisation ‘interRAI™’ who specialise in evidence-based assessment systems development.The Working Group are developing a CNA, initially paper based, which is currently being piloted with adult family carers in a longitudinal study across 11 countries, including Ireland, in order to finalise the tool. Once the pilot is complete, the CNA will be available as part of the interRAI integrated suite of assessment tools which are in use Ireland and internationally in an electronic format across health care settings.The target population for the pilot study are adult family carers who are providing an ongoing and significant level of care to an older person person who is in need due to illness, disability, or frailty. A family carer can be a relative, friend or neighbour. Approximately 600 Family Carers will be recruited internationally. The final potential target population in Ireland is all Family Carers who provide significant levels of care.This initiative is innovate as it represents a first between a state health agency, a number of not-for profit agencies and a leading academic health care assessment systems design collaboration (interRAI), in developing, testing and (potentially) implementing a comprehensive standardised assessment tool.Current models of CNA have not been exposed to sufficiently comprehensive evaluation.This paper charts the progression and challenges of this initiative, using an Implementation Science Framework. There will be a discussion on the learnings from the process together with a wider assessment of the future potential for Carer Needs Assessments in general.References:1- Arksey H, Hepworth D. Carers' Needs And The Carers Act: An evaluation of the process and outcomes of assessment. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, 2000.2- Becker S, Becker F, Silburn R, Silburn P, Sempik J. Carers’ Assessments in Nottinghamshire: Content,Process and Outcomes. Nottingham: Nottinghamshire Social Services Department, 2005.3- Department of Health. The National Carers’ Strategy. Department of Health. Ireland. 20124- Dieleman JL, Templin T, Sadat N, Reidy P, Chapin A, Foreman K, Haakenstad A, Evans T, Murray CJ, Kurowski C. National spending on health by source for 184 countries between 2013 and 2040. The Lancet. 2016 Apr 13.5- Donnelly, N. A. International Carer Needs Assessment Tools–A literature Review.Unpublished. 21036- Guberman N, E N, Nolan M, Doris R, Lundh U, Keefe J. Impact on practitioners of using a research-based carer assessment tools: Experiences from the UK, Canada, Sweden, with insights from Australia. Health and Social Care in the Community. 2003;11(4):345-55.7- Guberman N, Keefe J, Fancey P, Barylak L. 'Not another form!': lessons for implementing carer assessment in health and social service agencies. Health & social care in the community. 2007 Nov;15(6):577-87.8- Huber M, Hennessy P. Long-term care for older people. OECD Publishing; 2005.9- Kwak J, Montgomery RJV, Kosloski K, Lang J. The Impact of TCARE® on Service Recommendation, Use, and Caregiver Well-being. The Gerontologist. 2011 October 1, 2011;51(5):704-13.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,402
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,350
Écart entre enseignants0,316 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal of Integrated CareMême sujetIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingTravaux en français237 207