MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2766455438

Legacy of a Bomb: The Manhattan Project’s Impact on the Scientific Community - eScholarship

2009· article· en· W2766455438 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueBerkeley Scientific Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTwentieth Century Scientific Developments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHanford SiteNuclear weaponTributeWorld War IIManhattan projectPolitical scienceShut downSpanish Civil WarLawHistoryEconomic historyEngineeringWaste managementRadioactive waste
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Legacy of a Bomb WAR TECH SPRING WAR TECH The Manhattan Project’s Impact on the Scientific Community Above the pillared entrance of the University of dropped over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing hundreds of California Berkeley’s Doe library, the fair face of Athena, thousands of civilians and forcing Japan to finally surren- goddess of wisdom and war, smiles down on its visitors. der. Dual-natured Athena’s presence seems both fitting, yet odd After World War II, two of these three facilities on the Berkeley campus. While Berkeley may be the home remained important contributors to scientific discovery and of many reputable anti-war protests, the university’s technological innovations. Hanford Site remained a nuclear research department plays a large role in weapon develop- facility; it ran multiple reactors and produced tritium for ment. However, Berkeley is not alone in this dichotomy production of hydrogen bombs during the Cold War since many universities across the United States also con- (D’Antonio1993). In 1968, a major reactor was deactivated tribute to the development of war-related technology. Some in Hanford and most of the structures were encased and may protest that this research not only has negative effects buried. By 1987, all of the reactors were shut down. Today, on society, but also is antithetical to the progressive educa- Hanford Site is no more than a museum and remains an tion that students receive at such schools. area that demands extensive clean-up due to the early, leak- These critics, nevertheless, underemphasize that age-prone reactors. such research has a beneficial impact, especially on the sci- In contrast, the Los Alamos facility, now named the entific community. There is one specific military research Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), is still running. project that demonstrates well the complex relationship The LANL has continued to participate in military research between war and science: the Manhattan Project. This oper- and development. Even today it manages America’s nuclear ation ended the Second World War but also contributed to arsenal as part of the Nuclear Weapons Stockpile the making of the Cold War. It ushered in a Stewardship program. The LANL runs new age and raised many misgivings and threat detection and reduction programs fear as well. As will be demonstrated, how- and develops new technology for defense ever, the Manhattan Project’s legacy does and intelligence purposes. This lab also not entirely have to do with the military for researches in the areas of energy, material the operation also made an indelible mark science, computing, nanotechnology, and on research and education as well. the life sciences. The LANL has con- In 1941, while World War II was tributed significantly to the development of still raging, the Manhattan Project was com- biotechnology as well. In 1983, it began its missioned to develop the first nuclear partnership with Lawrence Livermore weapon. The majority of the project was National Laboratory and together the two Bust of Athena, Doe Library at the completed by the United States, although labs developed the National Laboratory University of California, Berkeley two other Allied nations, Britain and Gene Library project. The project conclud- Canada, both contributed to the undertaking as well. In the ed in 1995 after generating many libraries of the human United States, the bulk of the Manhattan Project was han- genome. The LANL has also made major advances in dled by three facilities that were constructed specifically for immunology. It published the first genetic sequence of the the project: Hanford Site, Oak Ridge, and Los Alamos. Oak HIV virus. Furthermore, the lab has built an impressive Ridge lab conducted research and development of success- database of genetic and immunological codes of various ful and controlled chain reaction and designed facilities pathogens. This database is available for all researchers to necessary to produce plutonium. Hanford Facility produced use. While the LANL remains a military research center, its plutonium and separated plutonium from uranium and fis- contributions to research and general science are also unde- sion byproducts (Brown & MacDonald 1977). The later niable. stages of the production of the first nuclear bomb were The Oak Ridge laboratory, now called Oak Ridge completed in Los Alamos. In 1945, as a result of this col- National Laboratory (ORNL), was less military-oriented laboration, the first atomic bombs were constructed and after the war, but like the LANL, its research has also http://www.alumni.berkeley.edu/imgs/Alumni/California_M onthly/2002_Feb/building_150athen150athena_bust.jpg by Jany Huan Gao

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,015
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,071
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0150,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0120,003
Communication savante0,0160,002
Science ouverte0,0030,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,087
Tête enseignante GPT0,297
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle