MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2766949640 · doi:10.5334/ijic.3747

Municipal health conferences in the state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany – ready for initiating and steering primary health care provisions at community level?

2017· article· en· W2766949640 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel Dröschel, Stefan Walzer, Lutz Vollmer, Alexander Pimperl

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal of Integrated Care · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueHealth and Medical Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCharterGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)Health carePublic relationsState (computer science)Political scienceBusinessPublic administrationEconomic growthEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: According to the Ottawa Charter of the World Health Organization "is Health created and lived by people within the settings of their everyday life; where they learn, work, play, and love." In this way, they attributed a central importance for human health to the "living worlds", such as municipalities, districts or cities. In order to identify the future regional and municipal challenges in the health sector, in the state of Baden-Wuerttemberg at an early stage and to proactively control them, municipal health conferences were introduced in 2013 by the state government. In 2015 these became compulsory for all counties and municipalities and should take place at least once a year, usually under the direction of the district administration. Assessing the current municipal health conferences objectively shows, that only a few well-functioning and working conferences can be identified. Key questions remain: What are the factors that promote and inhibit the establishment? And how can results be measured?Method: The 37 counties / urban areas were examined with regard to their implementation and realization status. In the process, the implementation processes have been analyzed and problem areas were identified through internet searches, interviews and through participation as guests.Results: The diversity of the different structures of the state council offices in Baden-Württemberg is also reflected in the introduction and implementation of health conferences. On the one hand, there are only a few lighthouse projects in which health conferences are seen and used as an active designer of community health care and which have set goals to achieve sustainable outcomes. The overwhelming part of the municipal health conferences shows rather hesitant activities. If any, their activities show a rhythm of one to two annual plenary sessions and interim working groups for a more detailed discussion of topics. Structural introductory errors can be identified as inhibiting factors. The following prerequisites may be identified as promoting factors for the development of the effectiveness of health conferences:The need for excellent expert capacities and committed skills to control the committee and its subgroups, specification or self-elaboration of clear guidelines for action,definition of achievable and measurable target values, as well assystematic evaluation of the results and outcomes.Conclusions: On the whole, health conferences as a driver and designer of regional health care, which is to actively advise and decide on a future-oriented, needs-based health care provisions, remain behind its possibilities. Clear guidelines for action and best-practice examples are encouraging processes in which the relevant stakeholders jointly identify municipal needs, negotiate municipal strengths and weaknesses, and look for new care solutions. The actual possibilities can be found in already well functioning health conferences, which unfortunately are so far still in the minority. At the same time policy processes indicate that legislative changes will lead to a transfer of power to initiate primary health care provisions at community level to municipally authorities. Therefore, municipally should strengthen activities in order to be prepared for future tasks and responsibilities.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,280
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,222
Tête enseignante GPT0,506
Écart entre enseignants0,284 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal of Integrated CareMême sujetHealth and Medical StudiesTravaux en français237 207