Relating altered rocks to equivalent protoliths using clustering and classification of geochemical data at the Minto copper-gold mine, Yukon, Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Linking protolith rocks to their equivalent altered counterparts in mineral deposits facilitates interpretation of original rock geometry and computing relative mass changes during metasomatism. However, deducing such relationships becomes elusive when dealing with very large databases of geochemical data; identifying sample pairs for altered and unaltered equivalents is challenging, correlations between elements may not be intuitive, and large amounts of data are laborious to interpret manually. Machine learning offers potential solutions to problems involving large numbers of data, many variables or features, and complicated relationships between variables. Here we present a workflow to process a whole rock geochemical dataset and produce labels for groups of similar least-altered protolith rocks, and then apply these labels to groups of altered rocks. Protolith samples were clustered using K-Means, a technique that involves partitioning n observations into K clusters such that each sample is associated to the cluster belonging to the nearest mean. This clustering approach is analogous to visually assigning samples to groups based on X-Y geochemical plots, e.g., granite AFM diagrams that geologists commonly use. The advantage of K-Means clustering is that many variables can be considered simultaneously. Altered samples were classified using Random Forests, a supervised classification algorithm, based on the cluster results for the protoliths groups. This approach allows the rapid association of altered samples to their likely corresponding protolith. Interpreting the results gives insight into original protolith geometry, and undertaking further processing can improve the understanding of chemical changes during alteration. Generating and spatially interpreting results took only a few hours, including QaQc and trialling different pre-processing approaches, and was completed without costly geochemical software. Cross section interpretations of protolith geometry, i.e., before ore deposit formation, has an added benefit of lithology label confidence measures from Random Forests. The motivation of this workflow is to assist geologists working with large drillhole datasets including geochemical information and manual logging information. A common task during exploration is to provide interpretations of site geology, and information about the effects and spatial extent of alteration related to mineralisation. These, in turn, give exploration and mining teams a basis for understanding the potential role of original rock geometry controls on the location of ore, or hallmarks of enveloping alteration zones. The aim of this workflow is to provide a high-speed approach to processing drillhole information that is reproducible and objective. However, the method is not intended to be a black box, and carefully selection of samples and consideration of results by a geologist is still required.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».