Development of integrated multi-trophic aquaculture in the Bay of Fundy, Canada: A socio-economic case study.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
While there are different definitions of sustainability, there is consensus that the concept includes socioeconomic variables as well as environmental integrity. For aquaculture to be sustainable there must be economic viability. The species cultivated must be profitable and not too risky. Without these two conditions entrepreneurs will have no incentive to invest, or will need permanent subsidies if they are to remain in the industry. In addition, there must be social acceptance of the industry. In a keynote address to the Millennium Conference on aquaculture, it was noted that “technological progress in the next millennium has to go hand-in-hand with social and ethical acceptability” (Pillay 2001). Enough evidence exists from around the world of the deleterious effects on the industry itself when there is social discontent from litigation, theft and vandalism. On the other hand, if there is community support, the aquaculture industry itself can be the primary beneficiary (Katrandis et al. 2003). These socioeconomic determinants complement the further criterion of sustainability; that aquaculture should be environmentally neutral, if not benign. This paper describes a project in the Bay of Fundy in New Brunswick that attempts to enhance aquaculture sustainability. The Bay of Fundy is Canada’s second largest area of salmon farming, after British Columbia. At present, Atlantic salmon are raised in cages using monoculture techniques, amid concerns about environmental and socioeconomic sustainability (Auditor General 2004). However, an alternative to monoculture is an integrated technique that cultivates different species on the same site. The project in the Bay of Fundy has three species: kelp, mussels and salmon at the same site, in the expectation that environmental and socioeconomic risks will be reduced because of synergies among the three species. The implications of this project are not confined to New Brunswick or even salmon farming. In Asia, paddy fields are often used to cultivate both rice and fish. In Ecuador, disease has prompted farmers to integrate shrimp with tilapia. In southern Africa, tilapia cultivation is integrated with cash crops such as hogs, bananas or crocodiles. Diversifying into additional crops reduces risks; it may also reduce feed costs and therefore add to farm profitability. To indicate the economic risks facing the salmon farming industry in the Bay of Fundy, the first section of this article illustrates the explosive growth of the industry worldwide. Aquaculture is the world’s fastest growing source of food and mariculture has grown particularly rapidly since the late 1980s. One mariculture species is Atlantic salmon, which is Canada’s principal cultivated species, by value. It is an internationally traded commodity, so expansion in the major producing countries jeopardizes small-scale producers in Canada. The second section suggests how data support a tentative conclusion that integrated aquaculture is sustainable economically. A third section summarizes a survey of social attitudes toward the project in the region. It answers the question of whether or not the public is in favor of integrated aquaculture, and what their concerns are.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».