MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2770263401 · doi:10.1215/00182168-3424192

Territorial Rule in Colombia and the Transformation of the Llanos Orientales

2016· article· en· W2770263401 sur OpenAlexaff
Alberto G. Flórez-Malagón

Notice bibliographique

RevueHispanic American Historical Review · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistory and Politics in Latin America
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFrontierModernization theoryPolitical scienceGeographyPerspective (graphical)CartographyRegional scienceHumanitiesEconomic historyHistoryLawArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

For more than 30 years, Professor Jane Rausch has been introducing us to a set of data that opens doors to the regional history of the Llanos, a Colombian region once described as the “Lands of the Future” by local politicians (p. viii). These tropical plains are situated in the southeastern part of Colombia, covering one-third of the country, and have been considered as relatively marginal in terms of the attention that they have garnered from historians. Rausch was the first to give a systematic look at the history of the region, and this volume completes the circle that began with her analysis of the region from the 1500s. In this fourth book of the series, the author picks up from where her previous volume left off and advances into the decades from 1946 to 2010.The Llanos case shows the difficulties of advancing modernization in that region, at least up to the start of the years explored by the author. In this latest volume, Rausch describes how the Llanos have increasingly integrated with the rest of the country during a challenging period of economic development, with the presence of transnational actors and with ongoing armed conflict. Following the seminal work by Frederick Jackson Turner and Alistair Hennessy, Rausch has been a pioneer in applying the concept of frontier to territorial transformations in Colombia. But in choosing to look at territorial advances from an institutional perspective, she misses the bottom-up perspectives and the multiplicity of agendas and discourses that circulated and confronted diverse actors in the process of forming this large sector of the country.The bibliography contains mostly the classic books on Colombian history from the 1960s and 1980s, but Rausch does not engage in current debates around the interpretations of the period of La Violencia and the most recent modalities of armed conflict. Missing the strong contributions of the subdiscipline dubbed “violentology” in Colombia, Rausch's book does not give space to deeper dialogue with a literature enriched in the last decades, for example, by analysis of amnesties, the contemporary armed conflict, the “geography of violence,” and the local dynamics of La Violencia.Instead, the book's approach derives from traditional political history, relying on the role of the Conservative and Liberal leadership. Consequently, the narrative centers on the presence of Gaitanismo, the populist movement in the 1940s, and its impact in the Llanos. From there, the author follows the traditional line of analysis: the emphasis on political parties, the role of Liberal guerrillas, the general modalities of armed conflict that remain to this day. Everyday life, culture, horizontal quarrels, gender, and environmental issues are missing from this approach. The indigenous population and its segregation, including the infamous massacres in the 1970s, the role of religious communities, both Catholic and Protestant (including foreign presence, as in the case of the Instituto Lingüístico de Verano), and the efforts of academia (as in the case of the experimental farm Gaviotas) indicate a richer set of national and international actors in the region, at least from the 1970s on. This richness receives no acknowledgment in the book. Even if Rausch describes some geographical and ecological constraints and mentions the important indigenous population, these critical issues are not properly addressed. Rausch could have discussed new perspectives on environmental history, cultural history, and the new social history of livestock in analyzing deeper the importance of cattle raising for this regional history.Nonetheless, the book makes contributions via novel sources that provide new information, and in that sense it is original in spite of its status as a general survey. Some anecdotes hint at a richer level of analysis of, for example, economic functioning and adaptations in the middle of the conflict (pp. 47–49), but these references remain as raw data without further discussion. For the reader unfamiliar with Colombian history, this can be a useful though limited introduction to the history of the Llanos region in recent decades. Hopefully, new historians inspired by Rausch's pioneering work and the archival sources that she has rescued will update the basic analysis developed by her once-unique and innovative contribution.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,886
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,795

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,288
Écart entre enseignants0,273 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHispanic American Historical ReviewMême sujetHistory and Politics in Latin AmericaTravaux en français237 207