Notice bibliographique
Résumé
On behalf of both the editorial board and the readership of the Journal of Time Series Analysis, I would like to take this opportunity to thank Professor Peter Robinson for his many years of dedicated service to our journal. Peter is stepping down as a Co-Editor with effect from 1st January 2018. I am, however, delighted to announce that Peter has agreed to remain on the editorial board as an Advisory Editor, with effect from 1st January 2018. Peter was first appointed to the editorial board in 1994. I have also greatly benefitted from his wise counsel since I took over as Editor of the journal and would like to personally thank Peter for all the help, advice and support he has given me. Morten Nielsen of Queen's University Canada. Morten holds the David Chadwick Smith Chair in Economics at Queen's and holds a Canada Research Chair in Time Series Econometrics. Morten's interests are wide-ranging but principally include: estimation and testing in fractional integration and co-integration models; semiparametric analysis of long memory processes; financial econometrics and high frequency data, and unit root and co-integration testing. Suhasini Subba Rao is Professor in the Statistics Department at Texas A&M University. Suhasini has published on a wide range of topics within time series analysis including: non-stationary and nonlinear processes, estimation and inference of time-varying ARCH processes, spatio-temporal processes, random coefficient models, nonparametric estimation for dependent data, and stationarity testing. Finally, while the Journal of Time Series has over the course of its history from time-to-time published shorter communications style papers we have tended to receive relatively few submissions of this type. We have therefore decided to explicitly develop a new section of the journal, titled Notes and Comments, dedicated to shorter communications papers and also articles which comment on papers which have been published in the journal. The remit of this new section, as laid out in our instructions to authors, is as follows: “Notes and Comments Section. This section of the journal publishes note-length communication papers. This is intended to facilitate the rapid dissemination of novel research ideas. Comments following up on previously published papers in the journal can also be considered for publication this section. The subject matter of all contributions to this section should lie within the standard aims and scope of the journal. All potential contributions will be peer-reviewed but that process will be expedited to facilitate rapid dissemination. Submissions should normally be no longer than 10 pages in total. On-line supporting material can be used in conjunction with articles published in this section.”
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».