MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2771490898 · doi:10.1182/blood.v130.suppl_1.2313.2313

Use of Anticoagulation in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia

2017· article· en· W2771490898 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Amaris Balitsky, John G. Kelton, Ishac Nazy, Brandon Aubie, Rumi Clare, Donald M. Arnold

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineImmune thrombocytopeniaInternal medicineHematologyThrombosisProspective cohort studyPlateletPediatrics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction : There is little evidence to guide practice on the use of anticoagulation (AC) for patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). In this study, we describe management of AC and clinical outcomes in patients with ITP who had a platelet count 9 /L while receiving AC. Methods : Patients were identified from the McMaster ITP Registry, a prospective registry of adult patients with thrombocytopenia ( 9 /L) referred to a tertiary hematology clinic in Canada. Patients who had a platelet count 9 /L and who were receiving AC at the same time were selected for this study. A detailed chart review was done to augment the clinical data from the registry. For every patient, we defined 9 at-risk encounters 9 as any occurrence of platelets 9 /L while simultaneously on AC. For each encounter, we described management decisions to either stop or continue AC; assessed bleeding events using a validated ITP bleeding tool, which graded the severity of bleeding from 0 (none) to 2 (severe); and recorded thrombotic events. This study was approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board. Results : Of 615 patients from the registry, 44 received AC at some point. Of those, 13 patients with ITP had platelets 9 /L while simultaneously on AC (n=44 encounters). Indications for AC were atrial fibrillation (n=6) or venous thrombosis (n=7). Median age was 74 years and 53.8% were female. Median follow up was 9 months (IQR 22 months). Of all encounters with AC management data available (n=35 encounters), 7 (20.0%) were associated with grade 2 bleeding, 6 (17.1%) were associated with grade 1 bleeding, and 20 (57.1%) were not associated with bleeding (2 were unknown). AC was stopped during 26 (74.3%) encounters; median platelet count was 15 x10 9 /L. Of those encounters where AC was stopped, 20 (76.9%) resulted in administration of ITP therapies to raise the platelet count; 7 (26.9%) were associated with a subsequent thrombotic event; and none were associated with subsequent grade 2 bleeds. There were 2 deaths among patients who stopped AC: 1) A 74 year-old female who had been receiving AC for atrial fibrillation (CHADS2 = 2) presented with a platelet count of 1 x10 9 /L and a grade 2 bleed. Ten days after stopping AC and receiving ITP treatments, repeat platelet count was 55 x10 9 /L and she developed a massive ischemic stroke resulting in death. 2) A 49 year-old male who had been receiving AC for recurrent deep vein thromboses had 3 encounters with platelets 9 /L and a grade 2 bleed. Two years after stopping AC and receiving multiple ITP treatments (repeat platelet count = 167 x10 9 /L), he developed sepsis and ultimately died of presumed pulmonary embolism. AC was continued during 9 (25.7%) encounters (median platelet count, 38 x10 9 /L). Of those, 5 (55.6%) resulted in the use of ITP therapies. There were no subsequent grade 2 bleeds. For encounters with platelets 9 /L (n=12), 11 stopped AC and there were 2 thrombotic events; AC was continued for 1 patient without any subsequent grade 2 bleeds. Conclusions : For patients with ITP who had platelets 9 /L and who were on AC, grade 2 bleeding events occurred during 20% of encounters. When AC was held, 27% of encounters resulted in thrombotic events; when AC was continued, no subsequent grade 2 bleeds were reported. These results suggest that for some patients with ITP, stopping AC can result in more harmful outcomes than continuing AC. Further studies are needed to define safe platelet count thresholds for AC in patients with ITP. Disclosures Arnold: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; Dova: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,009

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2017
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207