104 Distribution of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone and Kisspeptin Neurons in the Preoptic Area and Hypothalamus During the Estrous Cycle in Cows
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Gonadal steroids hormones indirectly regulate gonadotropin-rleasing hormone (GnRH) secretion. Kisspeptin (Kp) co-expresses steroid receptors and modulates GnRH release. The objective of the study was to characterise the number and proportion of GnRH and Kp immunoreactive cells and their association in the preoptic area (POA) and hypothalamus during different phases of the oestrous cycle in cows. Daily ovarian ultrasonography was performed to detect follicle development and ovulation (Day 0) after prostaglandin treatment. On Day 5, cows were assigned randomly to the following groups: proestrus (n = 2), metestrus (n = 2) or diestrus (n = 3). Cows in the diestrus group were killed on Day 8. Cows in the proestrus and metestrus groups were given luteolytic dose of prostaglandin on Day 5.5 and Day 6 and were killed on Day 7 and 24 h after the ensuing ovulation, respectively. Cow heads were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde via the carotid arteries to fix the brain in situ. The brain-stem (rostral portion of the POA to the mamillary body) was isolated by dissection and placed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 h. Following cryoprotection, the tissue block containing the POA and hypothalamus was frozen at –80°C and sectioned serially at a thickness of 50 mm using a cryostat microtome. Every 20th free-floating section was processed for double labelling using 2 sequential immuno-peroxidase reactions and ABC staining; Kp was immuno-labelled with Nickel-DAB at a dilution of 1:10,000 rabbit anti-kisspeptin (AC566, INRA, France), and GnRH was stained with DAB using 1:40,000 rabbit anti-GnRH (LR-5, Dr Benoit). The numbers of neuron cell bodies and fibres were recorded in different areas of the POA and the hypothalamus by brightfield microscopy using 10× and 40× objective lenses. Data were compared among groups by ANOVA. Major aggregations of Kp cells were localised in the mPOA, OVLT, and ARC. Overall, the number of Kp cells was higher in the metestrus v. diestrus group (719 ± 94 v. 378 ± 8; P = 0.01), but was similar to the proestrus group (558 ± 9). The number of Kp cells in the POA (mPOA, OVLT) tended to be higher in the metestrus v. diestrus group (395 ± 56 v. 147 ± 44; P = 0.06), and was intermediate in the proestrus group (206 ± 6). The number of Kp cells in the ARC did not differ among groups (metestrus 310 ± 26, diestrus 206 ± 53, proestrus 321 ± 99; P = 0.4). The number of GnRH cells bodies was not different among groups (metestrus 40 ± 3, diestrus 50 ± 9, proestrus 43 ± 8; combined; P = 0.8), and the distribution was higher in the POA (metestrus 25 ± 2, diestrus 30 ± 3, proestrus 33 ± 2) than hypothalamus. The proportion of GnRH cells in apposition to Kp fibres tended to be highest in the proestrus v. metestrus and diestrus groups (50.5 ± 1% v. 34.1 ± 9% and 31.4 ± 3%; P = 0.09). In conclusion, the number of Kp immunoreactive cells, but not GnRH cells, present in the POA and hypothalamus changed among different phases of the oestrous cycle due primarily to an increase in number of Kp cells in POA during metestrus. The proestrous phase was associated with an increase in apposition between Kp fibres and GnRH cells.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».