MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2772243260

Encountering Resistance To Gender Equity Policy in Educational Organization

2003· article· en· W2772243260 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Janice A Wallace

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGender Diversity and Inequality
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEquity (law)Public relationsSociologyResistance (ecology)Political scienceLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

became interested in researching the phenomenon of resistance to employment policy that attempted to increase gender equity in educational organizations because it came up over and over...at social gatherings, a cash register in a store while was Christmas shopping, in my graduate courses, and in my work at the Faculty of Education at The University of Western Ontario with both colleagues and students. found that students in the Social Foundations course that teach could generally see the fairness of gender equity in the classroom--at least in terms of calling on girls more often, assessing their work fairly, ensuring that they developed an interest in highly valued courses such as Math and Science, meeting the learning needs of boys in language and so on. However, when we talked about gender equity employment policy, the men were often openly hostile and the women resistant to what they perceived as needless efforts on their behalf. found that rational argumentation and statistical evidence, which strongly demonstrated sex-based discrimination in educational organizations, while compelling in some ways, was simply not enough to persuade students or colleagues that there was a need for policy to rework the gendered distribution of labour in educational organizations.  During my doctoral studies, began to research the history of employment equity policy in Ontario's educational organizations. One compelling argument offered in support of employment equity policy was that schooling cannot demonstrate equity in pedagogical practices if it does not also so in its patterns of governance. That is, educators cannot tell students to do as if the roles students see replicated in schools simply mirror the inequities of the larger social context. Therefore, advocates, such as the Federation of Women Teachers' Association, argued that, since Ontario, like many other Canadian provinces, has taken up gender fairness in classroom practices in its official educational policy for over thirty years, its employment policy must reflect the Ministry of Education's pedagogical goals. However, as various iterations of policy were put in place--each more prescriptive than the last--there was clear evidence that gender equity in employment practices in educational organizations was resisted at an organizational level.  As developed my research proposal, realized that it was the phenomenon of resistance to gender equity that wanted to understand more clearly. When told a colleague of mine what was thinking about doing, she responded with guarded optimism and then added: I just read an article by someone who tried to research resistance and she  came to the conclusion  that it was impossible. There have been many times when was tempted to come to the same conclusion during this long process...particularly as the policy context was researching kept slipping away from me. suppose one could say that was experiencing the phenomenon was researching.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,031
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,084
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,271

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0310,033
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0220,065
Communication savante0,0160,009
Science ouverte0,0020,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0100,012
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,091
Tête enseignante GPT0,375
Écart entre enseignants0,284 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2003
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Educational Administration and PolicyMême sujetGender Diversity and InequalityTravaux en français237 207