ارائه روشی بر مبنای پهنه بندی فازی و تصمیم گیری چند معیاره تاپسیس جهت انتخاب مناطق امیدبخش مس پورفیری در منطقه فلززایی شرق معدن مس سرچشمه
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction The growing demand for base metals such as iron, copper, lead and zinc on the one hand and the diminishing of surficial and shallow resources of these elements on the other hand have forced explorationists to focus on detecting deep deposits of these metals. As a result, the discovery of such deep deposits requires more advanced and sophisticated methods in the course of preliminary prospecting stages. Since the discovery of new deposits is getting to be increasingly difficult, deploying new prospecting technologies that employ more deposit attributes in the course of combining exploratory evidence may reduce the exploration costs with lower uncertainties. In the past two decades, a number of new data mining and integrating approaches capable of incorporating direct and indirect mineralization indicators, based on expert knowledge, data, or a combination of both, have been proposed )Bonham-Carter, 1994(. In the first step, the input exploratory data layers are corrected and validated through applying some statistical pre-processing algorithms such as background and outlier removal methods. In order to detect a mineralization occurrence, it is necessary to find the proper exploratory geological, geochemical and geophysical data layers which have direct or indirect associations with the governing mineralization followed by constructing these models in an appropriate GIS platform (Malkzewski, 1999). Due to the imperfect available data and a number of unknown parameters affecting the mineralization process, the application of conventional GIS integration methods such as Boolean or weighted overlay or even fuzzy logic methods alone may not produce appropriate results, pointing to a need for deploying multi-criteria decision-making methods such as TOPSIS. In the present study, the pre-processed exploratory data including geological, remotely sensed geophysical and geochemical imagery were used to detect favorable mineralization zones through applying the multi-criteria decision-making method. Finally, the selected favorable areas in the metallogenic strip located at the south to the south-east of the Sarcheshmeh porphyry copper deposit are prioritized and introduced for further follow up ground exploration operations. Methodology In order to solve complex decision-making problems like the problem of mapping favorable porphyry copper mineralization zones under great uncertainties, the TOPSIS method is considered as an appropriate approach offering significant simplicity, flexibility and capability (Ataei., 2010). The TOPSIS method is considered to be an efficient method due to having very high accuracy, speed, sensitivity as well as being easy to implement and interpret the outputted results (Hwang and Yoon, 1981). It has found many applications in important areas of mining industry where there is a need to make decisions under risky conditions and data uncertainties. One basic issue in applying decision-making methods in the field of mineral exploration is to rank and propose the best possible candidates among all potentially favorable areas for the next stage of mineral exploration. In this regard, the best favorable areas are selected based on exploratory data layers including favorable lithologies, alterations, structures plus geochemical and geophysical anomalies (Pazand et al., 2012). Results and discussion In the first step, the area located south to the southeast of one the largest porphyry copper deposits in Iran known as Sarcheshmeh was investigated for favorable areas using all available exploratory data as mentioned in the previous section using fuzzy logic integration approach in the GIS environment. Evaluating the highly favorable areas presented by the fuzzy logic approach showed great consistency with the already known copper mineralization prospects. Next, the first 20 priorities obtained from the fuzzy logic approach were chosen as the best candidates to be ranked using the TOPSIS multi criteria decision-making method. Among these favorable prospects, the one with the highest coefficient close to the ideal solution of 0.796 was found to be coincident with the Darehzar area that is a well known porphyry copper deposit 12 kilometers south of the Sarcheshmeh deposit. The favorable areas numbered 5 and 8 that correspond to well known porphyry copper mineralization prospects called Sereydoon and North Sereydoon were ranked as the second and third priorities with scores of 0.721 and 0.604, respectively. Other favorable areas ranked by the TOPSIS method were also prioritized and presented for further follow up explorations. To assess the sensitivity of the results obtained by the TOPSIS method, an amount of 10% of the values of each of the criteria were added and the outputted ranking results were compared to that of the original TOPSIS results. It was concluded that a slight change in the values of the criteria would not have significant impact on the results. However, 10 percent change of each criteria weight would greatly affect the prospects priorities obtained by re-applying the TOPSIS method. References Ataei, M., 2010. Multi Criteria Decision Making. Shahrood University Publications, Shahrood, 333 pp Bonham–Carter, G.F., 1994. Geographic information system for geoscientists-molding with GIS. Geological Survey of Canada, Ontario, Canada, 398 pp. Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K., 1981; Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 228 pp. Malkzewski, J., 1999, GIS and Multi Criteria Decision Analysis. John Whily and Sons, Canada, 387 pp. Pazand, K., Hezarkhani, A. and Ataei, M., 2012. Using TOPSIS approaches for predictive porphyry Cu potential mapping: A case study in Ahar-Arasbaran area (NW, Iran). Computers & Geosciences, 49(1): 62-71.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,077 | 0,035 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».