2004 Conference of the North American Academy of Ecumenists
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Columbus, Ohio, was the venue for the September, 2004, annual conference of the North American Academy of Ecumenists. This report highlights the theme and discussions of the three-day gathering from the perspective of one participant. theme chosen, The Church: Its Faith and Unity, identifies with the theme of a second Conference on Faith and Order in North America, which is proposed to take place in 2005 in New York. In that vein, academy presenters and participants focused their attention on issues that both unite and divide the churches today. Dr. George Lindbeck, Professor Emeritus of Yale University, opened the N.A.A.E. gathering by sharing venues of his ecumenical journey. His keynote address, Paris, Rome, Jerusalem: An Ecumenical Travelogue, first invited hearers to journey back to the initial experience that helped shape the ecumenical commitment of this well-known theological educator and dialogical interlocutor. Lindbeck was a member of the Lutheran-Roman Catholic Dialogue in the United States for many years. In that capacity he helped forge the way toward the Lutheran-Roman Catholic accord on the understanding of the doctrine of justification reached in Augsburg in 1999. Lindbeck, who looks upon theological dialogue as a conversation enabling its members to draw closer together in Christian unity, spoke of the malaise that hinders such encounter. Not only is there the enduring pain of not being able to share the eucharistic table, but today there is also a growing de-Christianization of our culture that thwarts ecumenical initiatives and weakens ecumenical enthusiasm. Laissez-faire thinking has lost sight of fundamental Christian teaching. Lindbeck takes the Lutheran-Roman Catholic Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification as an example. What happened in Augsburg makes little impact today. Contemporary culture no longer accepts the seriousness of sin in the way our forebearers of the sixteenth century did. Other attitudes also blur vision on the ecumenical journey today. Interdenominational activity become par with ecumenical relations. Interfaith concerns take precedence over the ecumenical imperative. Despite these odds, Lindbeck's story was a narrative of one man's passion for Christian unity and gratitude for the advances made toward the churches' seeking and finding their unity in Christ. He spoke of the structures that have supported the ecumenical movement, such as councils of churches. He also referred to the participation of churches that were initially outside the movement, in particular the Roman Catholic Church and its contribution to ecumenical dialogue. (See a revised form of the address in this issue, pp. 389-408). autobiographical touch continued in the presentations that followed. In response to the keynote address, Professor Margaret O'Gara of the University of St. Michael's College, Toronto, praised the commitment of George Lindbeck and pleaded for renewed commitment to the gift of exchange that characterizes ecumenical encounter. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle