Single-pill combinations (SPCs) and treatment of arterial hypertension in Poland : expert consensus statement of the Polish Society of Hypertension and Polish Cardiac Society Working Group on cardiovascular pharmacotherapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The reasons for the publication of current expert consensus statement after 4 years from the previous one are: the growing number of evidence on the benefits of the use of single-pill combinations (SPCs) in hypertension (also with concomitant dyslipidaemia), the extension of indications for their use in the hypertension management algorithm and the emergence in recent years after the publication of Polish Society of Hypertension experts’ position statement in 2013 of new types of SPCs available to doctors in Poland, including triple-drug combinations of antihypertensives and the so-called “hybrids” SPCs containing not only antihypertensive drugs but also statins. The current position statement of experts summarizes the progress of knowledge and practical application of SPCs of antihypertensives in Poland. It seems that there will be a long gap in the introduction of new classes of antihypertensive drugs. The only noticeable progress in the pharmacotherapy of hypertension in the last 15 years, which may explain some increase in the effectiveness of blood pressure control in patients, is more common use of SPCs of antihypertensive drugs. Analysis of European Society of Hypertension (ESH) experts’ lectures during this year’s ESH 2017 Annual Meeting in Milan suggests that the next edition of the 2018 ESH Guidelines may include major changes in the antihypertensive therapy algorithm, suggesting the need for initiation of pharmacologic treatment with combination therapy, i.e. SPCs, in most patients with hypertension. Combination of an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor + calcium antagonist should be considered optimal in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk. Undoubtedly, the position of this combination is due to the ACCOMPLISH trial in which such SPCs werefound to be more effective in reducing cardiovascular risk than SPCs composed of an ACE-inhibitor + thiazide diuretic. As a result of gradually increasing popularity of combined drugs, further SPCs that meet the criteria for optimal combination of antihypertensive drugs emerged in Poland between 2012 and 2017. Two of them provided the possibility of using SPCs in patients who do not need or should not use renin–angiotensin–aldosterone inhibitors. An interesting alternative is the SPC which contains antihypertensive agents along with other drugs used in cardiovascular prevention: statins and acetylsalicylic acid. This direction in the evolution of pharmacotherapy of hypertension is approaching the concept of “polypill”. In the opinion of the authors, the use of SPCs in antihypertensive therapy will increase in Poland, which may contribute to further improvement of pressure control in our country. At present, almost all useful anti-hypertensive agents are available in the form of two-drug SPCs. The combination of a sartan with beta-blocker for hypertensive patients with cardiac hypertrophy who do not tolerate ACE inhibitors and a “hybrid” SPCs of an ACE inhibitor + statin are still expected. Three-drug combinations: ACE inhibitor + beta-blocker + calcium antagonist, for patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease requiring intensive therapy, and ACE inhibitor + beta-blocker + statin, which will enable SPCs therapy for most patients, would also be useful.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».