Internet as a method of trolling offensive intelligence operations in cyberspace
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The paper analyzes Internet trolling as an operational intelligence activity, and the challenges it presents for national security, as well as the assessment of possible strategic protection of national cyberspace. This problem arises since collecting the data through automated programs eliminates guarantees of ethical grounds for their gathering in terms of clear reason, integrity of motives, proportionality of methods and the relevant authority. The basic thesis is that intelligence gathering on the Internet may be used against the basic values of states. Functionally, due to characteristics of the targets, trolling is conducive for collecting strategic information related to individual and collective attitudes and their contextualization; or the economic entities and critical infrastructure of national crisis management system, as well as for the influence on the political decisions. Also, because of the network properties, it is suitable for identifying, locating of potential sources of information and gaining their cooperation on the basis of motivation to support the objectives. The tasks of cyber data collection include psychological profiling, imposing attitudes, conducting secret surveillance on a massive scale and interception of communications. Internet trolling enables an access to primary data on the territory of other states, and thus it is suitable for secret and covert “installation” in the online community; for organized attack to infiltrate the government systems; for military and political interests; and for sabotaging various national infrastructure, communication and other systems. Structurally, the use of trolling as a mean of collecting data stems from the military development, today applied within the doctrine of “Full Dimension Operations”. It is conducted in an organized manner, with legend and rules of secrecy, so the trolls are agents of authorized agencies. Intelligence systems, like the “Five Eyes” (FVEY - the USA, GB, Australia, Canada and New Zealand) have software tools, available IP addresses and networks of computers which run programs difficult to identify (botnet), which allows them to troll undetectably. The methods and tasks revealed through structural and functional analysis enable the induction of threats and challenges for national security of other states. The principal challenges are the consequence of automatized methods and are democratic in nature. The primary risk for national security is the fact that it involves secret and organized efforts by other states to influence public opinion and dehumanization. Another is due to the fact that agencies of some countries have a capacity to secretly monitor communications in the cyberspace of other countries. Intelligence trolling can have an online operation against a certain state as an immediate goal, like misinformation and disinformation, creating HUMINT networks, or cyber attacks on critical infrastructure. With an aim to master the Internet, the FVEY agencies are trying to invade every possible system on the global net, searching to gain access to further systems. The strategic protection of national security in cyberspace requires a multi-dimensional approach, within the framework of the national security strategy. It must include science and research of the cyber space and social networks, as the preconditions; education for the use of the Internet at all levels, quality education and public information systems, in sense of prevention; and the criminalization of fraudulent messages and training of the judiciary for prosecution, in terms of repression.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».