Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, by James C. Kaufman and Robert J. Sternberg (Eds.) Cambridge University Press, 2010, 508 pages (ISBN 978-0-521-51366-1, CA $145.95 Hardback; ISBN 978-0-521-73025-9, CA $65.95 Paperback) Reviewed by SUSAN O 'NEILL DOI: 10.1037/a0025504 Over a decade has passed since Sternberg edited the Handbook of Creativity for Cambridge University Press. In the intervening years, Kaufman and Sternberg tell us that more than 10,000 publications have been devoted to the topic of creativity. In our modern world, manifestations of have become practically synonymous with what it means to reach our human potential. Today, companies such as Research In Motion, the creators of the Blackberry Smartphone, are almost as likely to hire graduates from the liberal arts and humanities as they are from science and technology. Creativity has become a valued resource. And yet, as Kaufman and Sternberg point out in this volume, even after six decades of research, definitions of remain elusive. Creativity research continues to be the subject of much debate. Still, the chapters in this volume demonstrate that progress is being made with an increasing convergence of components, contexts, and complexity. handbook is informative for students and newcomers to the field, as well as for those looking for up-to-date reviews of major theories and applications of research. A quick scan of the contents reveals an impressive array of topics by esteemed authors. book is divided into three main sections: 1) basic concepts, 2) diverse perspectives on creativity, and 3) contemporary debates. sections relate to three main questions: 1) can we define and measure this complex construct? 2) can we make use of its potential in a variety of areas and contexts? 3) can we recognise and negotiate the constraints on creativity? Section 1 presents an introduction to that examines historical contributions to research, theories of creativity, assessments of creativity, and the roles of in society. Aspects of have long been known as the P' s of creativity: person (or personality), process, product, and place. More recent conceptualisations have added persuasion, because creative people change the way other people think, and potential, which is the actualization of personality and place in combination with attitudes and values. According to Seana Moran in Chapter 4 The Roles of Creativity in Society, it is the function and purpose of that has become more important than traits or positions. I found her chapter compelling as she described how Internet communities provide people with opportunities for creativity-as-expression as a way of coping with the challenges of living in today's world. She argues, creativity results from a community, which is similar to participatory cultures that both inspire and support young people's creative engagement in digital media. Participatory cultures foster creative engagement by providing relatively low barriers to artistic expression, strong support for creating and sharing one's creations, informal mentorship, and a sense of social connection. I believe that these online communities offer a rich area for future research. Section 2 offers a broad selection of topics that include key perspectives on such as cognitive, developmental, educational, cross-cultural, and evolutionary approaches. As a music psychologist, I was particularly drawn to Paul Locher' s Chapter 7 entitled, How Does a Visual Artist Create an Artwork? Reading through the real-life case studies of the art-making process, I was reminded of past research involving protocol analysis and similar approaches that explored the process composers engage in while composing a piece of music. Creative activity is not only a byproduct of being involved in a creative process; it can act as a catalyst for moving through blocks and blind alleys in the creative process. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,051 | 0,039 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».