MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2776536091 · doi:10.1353/nin.2015.0067

Dodgerland: Decadent Los Angeles and the 1977–78 Dodgers by Michael Fallon, and: The Last Innocents: The Collision of the Turbulent Sixties and the Los Angeles Dodgers by Michael Leahy

2015· article· en· W2776536091 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andy McCue

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArt historyPerformance artPrideHistoryArtLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Dodgerland: Decadent Los Angeles and the 1977–78 Dodgers by Michael Fallon, and: The Last Innocents: The Collision of the Turbulent Sixties and the Los Angeles Dodgers by Michael Leahy Andy McCue Michael Fallon. Dodgerland: Decadent Los Angeles and the 1977–78 Dodgers. Lincoln, Ne: University of Nebraska Press, 2016. 454 pp. Cloth, $34.95. Michael Leahy. The Last Innocents: The Collision of the Turbulent Sixties and the Los Angeles Dodgers. New York: HarperCollins, 2016. 473 pp. Cloth, 26.99. These are two books by suburban Los Angeles boys, fans when young of the Dodgers in different dynastic decades. Michael Leahy, a veteran reporter for The Washington Post, writes about his Dodgers of the 1960s. Michael Fallon, an arts manager and writer in Minnesota, devotes his book to the team of the next decade. And there the similarities end. Leahy's book is rooted in the players' stories. He had extensive interviews with eight Dodger players, especially Maury Wills and Wes Parker, and shorter discussions with dozens of other Dodger players, opponents, fans and executives. The strength of the book is the players' willingness to delve into their emotions. They reveal the constant balancing between fear of failure and pride in achievement. They return again and again to the desire to be paid for those achievements and their struggles to get what they felt they deserved from ownership. There are constant reminders of just what a grind the 162-game season can be. The players talk of their growing fatigue—of their desire for the season to end. Their resentment when bundled off to a 1966 postseason tour to Japan is palpable. Wills and Koufax are pictured dealing with injuries that less driven people would take to the disabled list. The drive for excellence leads them to painkillers and stretching the rules. It's even conceded that Koufax once deliberately threw at somebody (Lou Brock). But only once. While Koufax wasn't one of those interviewed, his teammates refer to him constantly as a linchpin of the team and his experiences are a major theme. Michael Fallon, on the other hand, really loves Tom Wolfe. That's the journalist, not the novelist. The Dodgers of the late 1970s are the frame around which Fallon weaves his own tale, but, like his hero Wolfe, he's striving for the meta-story, the overarching tale lingering under a seemingly mundane narrative. That overarching tale is failure, the decline of "decadent" Los Angeles, a term that appears in the title but Fallon never defines, much less substantiates, in the book. It's clearly a meta-story that resonates with him personally. There is no indication in the text or notes that Fallon interviewed anybody for this book. He clearly has made an extensive search of newspaper and magazine [End Page 245] articles about the team, and books by or about members published subsequently, but the voice is very much Fallon's. Fallon does provide extensive footnotes to these sources and an index. Leahy, unfortunately, has neither footnotes nor an index, but the interviews pretty much speak for themselves. When each book turns to its promise to connect its team to the society around it, the different approaches show. Leahy's players talk about the racial tensions of the 1960s, the birth of the players' union, where they were when John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and Martin Luther King were shot. They recall driving home amid the flames of the Watts Rebellion and of worrying about relatives and friends in Vietnam. There are some nice contrasts. There's Wills, a child of the projects who had to fight his way through nine minor league seasons to be called to the Dodgers only in desperation, Yet, he forged a fourteen-year career which, in Leahy's opinion, merits that Hall of Fame. And then there's Parker, a scion of money, private schools and parents who demeaned him constantly. His rise to the majors was rapid, although his hitting came around years after his superb glove. Wills and the other players jumped on the Marvin Miller bandwagon. Parker, despite being the player rep, keeps his distance, a product of a belief system inculcated in...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,097
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,007
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,201
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207