Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Tatouages by Claudine Potvin Cristina Onesta Potvin, Claudine. Tatouages. Montréal: Levesque éditeur, 2014. Pp 134. ISBN 978-2-924186-58-9. $23 (Paper). Quebecois writer, Professor Emeritus at the University of Alberta and member of the Société Royale du Canada, Claudine Potvin offers Tatouages, a stunning collection of twenty short stories not simply about tattoos, but more generally about marks made by life itself. The title is a metaphor for the life experience that affects a human being’s search for identity in a “société désincarnée” (47). Potvin’s talent and knowledge as a writer and a scholar are clear from the first story, “K de Kafka ou de Kurt ou de Kébèc,” which portrays an attentive mother who is “obsessed” by the idea of “decoding” her daughter’s tattoo, a letter K. This first story opens the path to a deep reflection on several topics, such as relations to the Other, exile, memories, travels, passions, losses, body and language, all of which mark the characters’ lives. Thus, the reader travels to real cities—Buenos Aires, Montréal, Havana, New York, Paris—as well as to historical and atemporal places that recall past H(h)istories and generate the sensations and emotions of that specific dimension. This is a full dimension made of personal and universal experiences that reminds us of the complexity of existence, or, better, its absurdity, as the female protagonist of “Lieux communs” states: “Tel Sisyphe, je devrai assumer l’absurdité de mon existence. Je sors ma trousse de maquillage et m’enduis de crème antirides. Enfin, je soigne mes [End Page 207] insomnies” (88). This elderly woman is obsessed by her appearance and incessantly seeks surgical treatment. Her tattoos are the wrinkles, symbols of the wisdom and sorrow of life, that have transformed her body into a battlefield of wounds and masks. The idea of the tattoo is accompanied by a voyeuristic desire, often sexual in nature. Additionally, synesthesias highlight the sensorial dimension of the characters’ experiences. Thus, for instance, in “L’oeil d’Eléonore,” the eponymous character, with only one eye left, can see and touch her dreamlike world and the narrator of “Bar Teca” joins the erotic hide-and-seek game looking at the characters in their “échange” and the “violence du désir qui les (nous) possède tous” (45). Between sadomasochism and voyeurism, her female characters might be seen to mirror the personal path of the writer herself, as a woman and also an academic. The book is full of both direct and indirect intellectual references, such as to Saussure, Kristeva, Barthes and Bataille, among others. Furthermore, her characters are writers of fictions, they are fond of medieval literature (Potvin is a specialist of medieval literature) and they sometimes question the effectiveness and evidence of academic work itself. Among the punctilious and systematic epigraphs she puts at the beginning of each story, the one introducing “Léanne à l’école” overtly states: “‘Let’s face it, graduate theses don’t have much to offer, percentage-wise’ (Words of a tattooist) from the work of Margo De Mello, Bodies of Inscription. A cultural history of modern tattoo community” (121). The last sentence by the narrator of this story is illuminating: “Pour l’amour, je plongerais dans l’encrier, je m’adonnerais à l’art du coloriage” (124). The narrator, alter ego of the Writer, celebrates artistic creation, art for art’s sake, encouraging all to be seduced by the emotional vortex of being written while writing and, on the other hand, read while reading. Real and symbolic tattoos are thus intermingled, blurring the barriers between reality and fiction. Thus, Tatouage is clearly a reflection on the function of literature, more specifically on the writing process itself and the intimate relations between the writer and her own tattoo, the text. As a matter of fact, Potvin uses a sensual writing that seems to proceed by impressionist touches of painting leaving a powerful sign not only in the text, but also in the reader’s mind which is, in turn, tattooed by the colors of the words he/she reads. Lexical enumeration, numeral asyndetons, synesthesias, word...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».